Impact of a chest-pain guideline on clinical decision-making

被引:22
作者
Boufous, S
Kelleher, PW
Pain, CH
Dann, LM
Ieraci, S
Jalaludin, BB
Gray, AL
Harris, SE
Juergens, CP
机构
[1] Bankstown Lidcombe Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Bankstown, NSW 2200, Australia
[2] S Western Sydney Area Hlth Serv, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.5694/j.1326-5377.2003.tb05253.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the impact of a chest-pain guideline on clinical decision-making and medium-term outcomes of patients presenting to a hospital emergency department (ED) with non-traumatic chest pain. Design: Before-and-after guideline implementation study. Setting: Bankstown-Lidcombe Hospital, Sydney, NSW (454-bed metropolitan teaching hospital), in the six-month periods before and after guideline implementation in February 2001. Participants: Patients presenting to the ED with non-traumatic chest pain who had chest-pain assessment forms completed by ED doctors, comprising 422/768 (54.9%) of those presenting before and 461/691 (66.7%) after guideline implementation. Main outcome measures: Appropriateness of admission/discharge decisions compared with decision of senior cardiologist based on guideline; death, recurrent chest pain, ED re-presentation and hospital readmission in the ensuing three months. Results: After guideline implementation, appropriate admission/discharge decisions increased significantly from 180/265 (68%) to 261/324 (81%) (difference, 13%; 95% Cl, 6%-20%). The largest increase was for patients at moderate risk of death or acute myocardial infarction within six months, from 39/96 (38%) to 57/103 (55%) (difference, 18%; 95% Cl, 4%-31%). Increases were seen for both junior doctors (interns and resident medical officers) (18%; 95% Cl, 7%-30%) and senior doctors (11%; 95% Cl, 2%-19%). Logistic regression showed that implementation of the guideline, seniority of assessing doctor and patient history of coronary disease were independent predictors of appropriate decisions. There was a significant decline in re-presentations to ED with recurrent chest pain in patients previously presenting with cardiac or possibly cardiac pain, from 46/201 (23%) before implementation to 32/247 (13%) after (difference, - 10%; 95% Cl, - 11% to - 3%). Conclusions: The chest-pain guideline resulted in a significant improvement in clinical decision-making in the ED and reduced re-presentations with cardiac/possibly cardiac chest pain.
引用
收藏
页码:375 / 380
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   Chest pain-please admit: is there an alternative? A rapid cardiological assessment service may prevent unnecessary admissions [J].
Capewell, S ;
McMurray, J .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 320 (7240) :951-952
[2]   Do management algorithms improve chest pain triage? [J].
Fitzpatrick, MA ;
Dodd, M ;
Schoevers, D ;
Tracey, E .
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 1999, 171 (08) :402-406
[3]   An emergency department-based protocol for rapidly ruling out myocardial ischemia reduces hospital time and expense: Results of a randomized study (ROMIO) [J].
Gomez, MA ;
Anderson, JL ;
Karagounis, LA ;
Muhlestein, JB ;
Mooers, FB .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1996, 28 (01) :25-33
[4]  
GRIMSHAW JM, 1994, EFFECTIVE HLTH CARE, V8, P1
[5]  
Herren KR, 2001, BRIT MED J, V323, P1
[6]   Implementing national guidelines at local level - Changes in clinicians' behaviour in primary care need to be reflected in secondary care [J].
Jankowski, RF .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 322 (7297) :1258-1259
[7]  
Katz DA, 1996, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V276, P1568
[8]  
LEE TH, 1985, ARCH INTERN MED, V145, P65, DOI 10.1001/archinte.145.1.65
[9]   SENSITIVITY OF ROUTINE CLINICAL-CRITERIA FOR DIAGNOSING MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION WITHIN 24 HOURS OF HOSPITALIZATION [J].
LEE, TH ;
ROUAN, GW ;
WEISBERG, MC ;
BRAND, DA ;
COOK, EF ;
ACAMPORA, D ;
GOLDMAN, L .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1987, 106 (02) :181-186
[10]  
*NAT HLTH MED RES, 1998, DIAGN MAN UNST ANG