Impact of a chest-pain guideline on clinical decision-making

被引:22
作者
Boufous, S
Kelleher, PW
Pain, CH
Dann, LM
Ieraci, S
Jalaludin, BB
Gray, AL
Harris, SE
Juergens, CP
机构
[1] Bankstown Lidcombe Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Bankstown, NSW 2200, Australia
[2] S Western Sydney Area Hlth Serv, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.5694/j.1326-5377.2003.tb05253.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the impact of a chest-pain guideline on clinical decision-making and medium-term outcomes of patients presenting to a hospital emergency department (ED) with non-traumatic chest pain. Design: Before-and-after guideline implementation study. Setting: Bankstown-Lidcombe Hospital, Sydney, NSW (454-bed metropolitan teaching hospital), in the six-month periods before and after guideline implementation in February 2001. Participants: Patients presenting to the ED with non-traumatic chest pain who had chest-pain assessment forms completed by ED doctors, comprising 422/768 (54.9%) of those presenting before and 461/691 (66.7%) after guideline implementation. Main outcome measures: Appropriateness of admission/discharge decisions compared with decision of senior cardiologist based on guideline; death, recurrent chest pain, ED re-presentation and hospital readmission in the ensuing three months. Results: After guideline implementation, appropriate admission/discharge decisions increased significantly from 180/265 (68%) to 261/324 (81%) (difference, 13%; 95% Cl, 6%-20%). The largest increase was for patients at moderate risk of death or acute myocardial infarction within six months, from 39/96 (38%) to 57/103 (55%) (difference, 18%; 95% Cl, 4%-31%). Increases were seen for both junior doctors (interns and resident medical officers) (18%; 95% Cl, 7%-30%) and senior doctors (11%; 95% Cl, 2%-19%). Logistic regression showed that implementation of the guideline, seniority of assessing doctor and patient history of coronary disease were independent predictors of appropriate decisions. There was a significant decline in re-presentations to ED with recurrent chest pain in patients previously presenting with cardiac or possibly cardiac pain, from 46/201 (23%) before implementation to 32/247 (13%) after (difference, - 10%; 95% Cl, - 11% to - 3%). Conclusions: The chest-pain guideline resulted in a significant improvement in clinical decision-making in the ED and reduced re-presentations with cardiac/possibly cardiac chest pain.
引用
收藏
页码:375 / 380
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
[11]  
*NAT HLTH MED RES, 1998, GUID DEV IMPL EV CLI
[12]  
National Centre for Classification in Health, 2008, NATL CTR CLASSIFICAT
[13]   A critical pathway for management of patients with acute chest pain who are at low risk for myocardial ischemia: Recommendations and potential impact [J].
Nichol, G ;
Walls, R ;
Goldman, L ;
Pearson, S ;
Hartley, LH ;
Antman, E ;
Stockman, M ;
Teich, JM ;
Cannon, CP ;
Johnson, PA ;
Kuntz, KM ;
Lee, TH .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1997, 127 (11) :996-1005
[14]   Costs of an emergency department-based accelerated diagnostic protocol vs hospitalization in patients with chest pain - A randomized controlled trial [J].
Roberts, RR ;
Zalenski, RJ ;
Mensah, EK ;
Rydman, RJ ;
Ciavarella, G ;
Gussow, L ;
Das, K ;
Kampe, LM ;
Dickover, B ;
McDermott, MF ;
Hart, A ;
Straus, HE ;
Murphy, DG ;
Rao, R .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1997, 278 (20) :1670-1676
[15]  
*SAS I, 2000, SAS STAT SOFTW VERS
[16]  
*STATS DIR LTD, 2001, STATS DIR STAT SOFTW
[17]  
Thompson PL, 2001, MED J AUSTRALIA, V174, P211, DOI 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2001.tb143235.x
[18]  
Wakerman J, 2001, MED J AUSTRALIA, V175, P287