Beef with environmental and quality attributes: Preferences of environmental group and general population consumers in Saskatchewan, Canada

被引:15
作者
Belcher, Ken W.
Germann, Andrea E.
Schmutz, Josef K.
机构
[1] Univ Saskatchewan, Dept Agr Econ, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A8, Canada
[2] Univ Saskatchewan, Ctr Studies Agr Law & Environm, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
关键词
conjoint analysis; consumer preferences; credence attributes; environmental goods and services; riparian zones; water quality;
D O I
10.1007/s10460-007-9069-x
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 [农学];
摘要
We attempt to quantify and qualify the preferences of consumers for beef with a number of environmental and food quality attributes. Our goal is to evaluate the viability of a proposed food co-operative based in the Wood River watershed of southern Saskatchewan, Canada. The food co-operative was designed to provide a price premium to producers who adopted alternative management practices. In addition, the study evaluated the acceptance of a proposed food co-operative by consumer that had environmental interests as compared to the general population. Conjoint analysis was used to determine the trade-off and relative value of beef with the following production and purchasing characteristics: (a) use of hormones, antibiotics and vaccination in production; (b) method of obtaining the beef including monthly or yearly purchase contracts or a local market; (c) price relative to beef purchased from the local grocery store; and (d) impact on the river ecosystem. Consumers from environmental groups had stronger environmental and food quality preferences than individuals from the general population. However, consumers from both groups expressed a willingness to pay higher prices for food that had these attributes. It was uncertain whether the magnitude of the premium, in combination with a desire not to enter a long-term purchasing commitment, would be large enough to encourage farmers to adopt the alternative management.
引用
收藏
页码:333 / 342
页数:10
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]
COMBINING REVEALED AND STATED PREFERENCE METHODS FOR VALUING ENVIRONMENTAL AMENITIES [J].
ADAMOWICZ, W ;
LOUVIERE, J ;
WILLIAMS, M .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1994, 26 (03) :271-292
[2]
AFNES F, 2004, EUROCHOICES, V3, P18
[3]
Anderson RC, 2004, FOREST PROD J, V54, P42
[4]
[Anonymous], 2022, SCI DIPLOMACY
[5]
What will consumers pay for social product features? [J].
Auger, P ;
Burke, P ;
Devinney, TM ;
Louviere, JJ .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2003, 42 (03) :281-304
[6]
The valuation of the IJmeer nature reserve using conjoint analysis [J].
Baarsma, BE .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2003, 25 (03) :343-356
[7]
Global variation in terrestrial conservation costs, conservation benefits, and unmet conservation needs [J].
Balmford, A ;
Gaston, KJ ;
Blyth, S ;
James, A ;
Kapos, V .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2003, 100 (03) :1046-1050
[8]
A comparison of stated preference methods for environmental valuation [J].
Boxall, PC ;
Adamowicz, WL ;
Swait, J ;
Williams, M ;
Louviere, J .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 1996, 18 (03) :243-253
[9]
Caswell J. A., 1998, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, V27, P151
[10]
Is the decline of Burrowing Owls Speotyto cunicularia in prairie Canada linked to changes in Great Plains ecosystems? [J].
Clayton, KM ;
Schmutz, JK .
BIRD CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL, 1999, 9 (02) :163-185