The study of critical junctures - Theory, narrative, and counterfactuals in historical institutionalism

被引:958
作者
Capoccia, Giovanni [1 ]
Kelemen, R. Daniel
机构
[1] Amer Polit Sci Assoc, Washington, DC 20036 USA
[2] Univ Oxford, Dept Polit, Oxford OX1 2JD, England
关键词
D O I
10.1017/S0043887100020852
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
The causal logic behind many arguments in historical institutionalism emphasizes the enduring impact of choices made during critical junctures in history. These choices close off alternative options and lead to the establishment of institutions that generate self-reinforcing path-dependent processes. Despite the theoretical and practical importance of critical junctures, however, analyses of path dependence often devote little attention to them. The article reconstructs the concept of critical junctures, delimits its range of application, and provides methodological guidance for its use in historical institutional analyses. Contingency is the key characteristic of critical junctures, and counterfactual. reasoning and narrative methods are necessary to analyze contingent factors and their impact. Finally, the authors address specific issues relevant to both cross-sectional and longitudinal comparisons of critical junctures.
引用
收藏
页码:341 / +
页数:30
相关论文
共 128 条
[31]  
CAPOCCIA G, 2001, EUROPEAN J POLITICAL, V39
[32]  
Capoccia Giovanni., 2005, DEFENDING DEMOCRACY
[33]  
CARPENTER D, 2000, SOCIAL SCI HIST, V24
[34]  
Collier David, 1996, WORLD POLITICS, V49
[35]  
Collier RuthB., 1991, SHAPING POLITICAL AR
[36]  
CORTELL A, 1999, BRIT J POLIT SCI, V29, P287
[37]  
DANSALTER, 2007, ANN M AM POL SCI ASS
[38]  
DAVID P, 2000, UNPUB PATH DEPENDENC, P10
[39]  
Dawkins R., 1996, The Blind Watchmaker, Vthird
[40]  
DJELIC ML, 2004, CHANGING CAPITALISM, P137