Technoeconomic analysis of five microalgae-to-biofuels processes of varying complexity

被引:138
作者
Amer, Luke [2 ]
Adhikari, Birendra [1 ]
Pellegrino, John [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Dept Mech Engn, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[2] Univ Colorado, Dept Chem & Biol Engn, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
关键词
Biofuel; Economics; Microalgae; Open pond; Photobioreactor; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; BIODIESEL PRODUCTION; BIOMASS;
D O I
10.1016/j.biortech.2011.08.010
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
The economics surrounding five algae-to-fuels process scenarios were examined. The different processes modeled were as follows: an open pond producing either triacylglycerides (TAG) or free fatty acid methyl ester (FAME), a solar-lit photobioreactor producing either FAME or free fatty acids (FFA), and a light emitting diode irradiated (LED-lighted) photobioreactor producing TAG. These processes were chosen to represent both classical and esoteric approaches presented in the open literature. Viable (or suggested) processing techniques to liberate and purify (and convert) the microalgal triacylglycerides were then modeled to accompany each growth option. The investment and cost per kg of fuel or fuel precursor for each process was determined. The open pond produced TAG at similar to$7.50/kg, while the process using the LED-lit photobioreactor produced TAG at similar to$33/kg. The scenario containing the solar-lit photobioreactor produced FAME at similar to$25/kg, while the open pond produced FAME at similar to$4/kg. The scenario containing the solar-lit photobioreactor produced FFA at similar to$29/kg. The open pond scenarios appear to be closest to the $1/kg pricepoint at this time, and thus are the most viable economic options. Future technological advancements that reduce the cost of bioreactor vessels, LED lighting, and solvent recovery, may reduce the oil production costs of these scenarios to a more attractive level. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:9350 / 9359
页数:10
相关论文
共 31 条
[21]  
Seider W.D., 2004, PRODUCT PROCESS DESI, V2nd
[22]  
Sheehan J., 1998, BIODIESEL ALGAE, P325
[23]  
Shen Y, 2009, T ASABE, V52, P1275, DOI 10.13031/2013.27771
[24]   Renewable fuels from algae: An answer to debatable land based fuels [J].
Singh, Anoop ;
Nigam, Poonam Singh ;
Murphy, Jerry D. .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 102 (01) :10-16
[25]   Mechanism and challenges in commercialisation of algal biofuels [J].
Singh, Anoop ;
Nigam, Poonam Singh ;
Murphy, Jerry D. .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 102 (01) :26-34
[26]   Life-Cycle Assessment of Potential Algal Biodiesel Production in the United Kingdom: A Comparison of Raceways and Air-Lift Tubular Bioreactors [J].
Stephenson, Anna L. ;
Kazamia, Elena ;
Dennis, John S. ;
Howe, Christopher J. ;
Scott, Stuart A. ;
Smith, Alison G. .
ENERGY & FUELS, 2010, 24 (07) :4062-4077
[27]   Why microalgal biofuels won't save the internal combustion machine [J].
van Beilen, Jan B. .
BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS & BIOREFINING-BIOFPR, 2010, 4 (01) :41-52
[28]   Theory of electroporation: A review [J].
Weaver, JC ;
Chizmadzhev, YA .
BIOELECTROCHEMISTRY AND BIOENERGETICS, 1996, 41 (02) :135-160
[29]   Theoretical Maximum Algal Oil Production [J].
Weyer, Kristina M. ;
Bush, Daniel R. ;
Darzins, Al ;
Willson, Bryan D. .
BIOENERGY RESEARCH, 2010, 3 (02) :204-213
[30]   Microalgae as biodiesel & biomass feedstocks: Review & analysis of the biochemistry, energetics & economics [J].
Williams, Peter J. le B. ;
Laurens, Lieve M. L. .
ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2010, 3 (05) :554-590