Evaluation of five different cDNA labeling methods for microarrays using spike controls

被引:27
作者
Badiee, A [1 ]
Eiken, HG
Steen, VM
Lovlie, R
机构
[1] Univ Bergen, Haukeland Univ Hosp, Ctr Med Genet & Mol Med, Bergen, Norway
[2] Univ Bergen, Dr E Martens Res Grp Biol Psychiat & Locus Neuros, Bergen, Norway
关键词
D O I
10.1186/1472-6750-3-23
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Background: Several different cDNA labeling methods have been developed for microarray based gene expression analysis. We have examined the accuracy and reproducibility of such five commercially available methods in detection of predetermined ratio values from target spike mRNAs (A. thaliana) in a background of total RNA. The five different labeling methods were: direct labeling (CyScribe), indirect labeling (FairPlay(TM) - aminoallyl), two protocols with dendrimer technology (3DNA(R) Array 50(TM) and 3DNA(R) submicro(TM)), and hapten-antibody enzymatic labeling (Micromax(TM) TSA(TM)). Ten spike controls were mixed to give expected Cy5/Cy3 ratios in the range 0.125 to 6.0. The amounts of total RNA used in the labeling reactions ranged from 5 - 50 mug. Results: The 3DNA array 50 and CyScribe labeling methods performed best with respect to relative deviation from the expected values (16% and 17% respectively). These two methods also displayed the best overall accuracy and reproducibility. The FairPlay method had the lowest total experimental variation (22%), but the estimated values were consistently higher than the expected values (36%). TSA had both the largest experimental variation and the largest deviation from the expected values (45% and 48% respectively). Conclusion: We demonstrate the usefulness of spike controls in validation and comparison of cDNA labeling methods for microarray experiments.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
Deyholos MK, 2001, CYTOMETRY, V43, P229, DOI 10.1002/1097-0320(20010401)43:4<229::AID-CYTO1055>3.3.CO
[2]  
2-U
[3]   Measuring absolute expression with microarrays with a calibrated reference sample and an extended signal intensity range [J].
Dudley, AM ;
Aach, J ;
Steffen, MA ;
Church, GM .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2002, 99 (11) :7554-7559
[4]   Representation is faithfully preserved in global cDNA amplified exponentially from sub-picogram quantities of mRNA [J].
Iscove, NN ;
Barbara, M ;
Gu, M ;
Gibson, M ;
Modi, C ;
Winegarden, N .
NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2002, 20 (09) :940-943
[5]   Importance of replication in microarray gene expression studies: Statistical methods and evidence from repetitive cDNA hybridizations [J].
Lee, MLT ;
Kuo, FC ;
Whitmore, GA ;
Sklar, J .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2000, 97 (18) :9834-9839
[6]   Comparison of different labeling methods for two-channel high-density microarray experiments [J].
Manduchi, E ;
Scearce, LM ;
Brestelli, JE ;
Grant, GR ;
Kaestner, KH ;
Stoeckert, CJ .
PHYSIOLOGICAL GENOMICS, 2002, 10 (03) :169-179
[7]  
Ramdas L, 2001, GENOME BIOL, V2
[8]   Comparison of fluorescent tag DNA labeling methods used for expression analysis by DNA microarrays [J].
Richter, A ;
Schwager, C ;
Hentze, S ;
Ansorge, W ;
Hentze, MW ;
Muckenthaler, M .
BIOTECHNIQUES, 2002, 33 (03) :620-630
[9]  
SCHUCHHARDT J, 2000, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES, V28, pE47, DOI DOI 10.1093/NAR/28.10.E47
[10]   Navigating gene expression using microarrays - a technology review [J].
Schulze, A ;
Downward, J .
NATURE CELL BIOLOGY, 2001, 3 (08) :E190-E195