Soft balancing in the age of US primacy

被引:256
作者
Paul, TV [1 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1162/0162288054894652
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
Analysts have argued that balance of power theory has become irrelevant to understanding state behavior in the post-Cold War international system dominated by the United States. Second-tier major powers (such as China, France, and Russia) and emerging powers (such as Germany and India) have refrained from undertaking traditional hard balancing through the formation of alliances or arms buildups. None of these states fears a loss of its sovereign existence as a result of increasing U.S. power. Nevertheless, some of these same states have engaged in soft-balancing strategies, including the formation of temporary coalitions and institutional bargaining, mainly within the United Nations, to constrain the power as well as the threatening behavior of the United States. Actions taken by others in response to U.S. military intervention in the Kosovo conflict of 1999 and the Iraq war of 2003 offer examples of soft balancing against the United States.
引用
收藏
页码:46 / +
页数:28
相关论文
共 103 条
  • [21] Claude Inis L., 1962, Power and International Relations
  • [22] COHEN A, 2001, BACKGROUNDER 1459
  • [23] Copeland DaleC., 2000, ORIGINS MAJOR WAR
  • [24] Gulf War: The German resistance
    Dalgaard-Nielsen, A
    [J]. SURVIVAL, 2003, 45 (01) : 99 - +
  • [25] DOYLE MICHAEL, 1986, EMPIRES, P12
  • [26] LIBERALISM AND WORLD-POLITICS
    DOYLE, MW
    [J]. AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 1986, 80 (04) : 1151 - 1169
  • [27] Elman Colin, 2003, REALISM BALANCING PO, P9
  • [28] China's challenge to Pax Americana
    Feigenbaum, EA
    [J]. WASHINGTON QUARTERLY, 2001, 24 (03): : 31 - 43
  • [29] FINN P, 2003, WASHINGTON POST 0212
  • [30] FINN P, 2003, WASHINGTON POST 0211