Efficacy and tolerability of cefprozil versus amoxicillin/clavulanate for the treatment of adults with severe sinusitis

被引:9
作者
Adelglass, J [1 ]
Bundy, JM [1 ]
Woods, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Res Across Amer, Dallas, TX USA
关键词
sinusitis; cefprozil; amoxicillin/clavulanate;
D O I
10.1016/S0149-2918(98)80108-2
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Cefprozil is a beta-lactamase-stable oral cephalosporin with an antimicrobial spectrum that includes gram-positive and gramnegative pathogens commonly associated with acute bacterial sinusitis, one of the most common upper respiratory tract infections among adults. We conducted a multicenter, open-label study to compare the efficacy and safety of cefprozil and amoxicillin/clavulanate in the treatment of adults with severe acute bacterial sinusitis diagnosed by clinical and radiographic criteria. A total of 278 patients entered the study, 140 (59 males, 81 females) in the cefprozil group and 138 (69 males, 69 females) in the amoxicillin/clavulanate group. Patients were randomized to 10 days of treatment with either cefprozil 500 mg BID or amoxicillin/clavulanate 500 mg/125 mg TID. Clinical severity was assessed at study entry, and patients were stratified based on symptom grade. Efficacy was evaluated using a 10-point questionnaire administered during, at the end of, and 2 weeks after completing therapy. At the end of treatment, 84.5% (71/84) of patients with severe sinusitis treated with cefprozil had a satisfactory clinical response, which was not significantly different from the 89.9% (80/89) of patients in the amoxicillin/clavulanate group who had a satisfactory clinical response. Two weeks after completing treatment, 80.8% (63/78) of cefprozil-treated patients and 81.0% (64/79) of amoxicillin/clavulanate-treated patients with severe sinusitis had a satisfactory response. Relapse was more common among amoxicillin/clavulanate patients (6/70; 8.6%) than among cefprozil patients (2/65; 3.1%), but the difference was not statistically significant. Significantly more amoxicillin/clavulanate-treated patients experienced adverse events compared with cefprozil-treated patients (P < 0.001), including diarrhea (P < 0.001), nausea (P < 0.042), and rash (P < 0.035). Three times as many amoxicillin/clavulanate patients discontinued treatment because of adverse events. Cefprozil demonstrated comparable clinical efficacy to amoxicillin/clavulanate in the treatment of adults with severe sinusitis; however, cefprozil was associated with a significantly lower incidence of diarrhea, nausea, and rash.
引用
收藏
页码:1115 / 1129
页数:15
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
BARBARASH RA, 1992, INFECT MED SE, V9, P40
[2]   Intranasal budesonide spray as an adjunct to oral antibiotic therapy for acute sinusitis in children [J].
Barlan, IB ;
Erkan, E ;
Bakir, M ;
Berrak, S ;
Basaran, MM .
ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY, 1997, 78 (06) :598-601
[3]  
BENSON V, 1994, VITAL HLTH STAT
[4]  
CALVER AD, 1997, CLIN INFECT DIS, V24, P750
[5]   CLINICAL COMPARISON OF CEFUROXIME AXETIL AND AMOXICILLIN CLAVULANATE IN THE TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH ACUTE BACTERIAL MAXILLARY SINUSITIS [J].
CAMACHO, AE ;
COBO, R ;
OTTE, J ;
SPECTOR, SL ;
LERNER, CJ ;
GARRISON, NA ;
MINITI, A ;
MYDLOW, PK ;
GIGUERE, GC ;
COLLINS, JJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1992, 93 (03) :271-276
[6]   EVALUATION OF ANTIBIOTIC EFFECT OF TREATMENT OF MAXILLARY SINUSITIS [J].
CARENFELT, C ;
ENEROTH, CM ;
LUNDBERG, C ;
WRETLIND, B .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1975, 7 (04) :259-264
[7]  
Collins J G, 1993, Vital Health Stat 10, P1
[8]  
DEABATE CA, 1992, J CHEMOTHERAPY, V4, P358
[9]   Antibiotic resistance among clinical isolates of Haemophilus influenzae in the United States in 1994 and 1995 and detection of beta-lactamase-positive strains resistant to amoxicillin-clavulanate: Results of a national multicenter surveillance study [J].
Doern, GV ;
Brueggemann, AB ;
Pierce, G ;
Holley, HP ;
Rauch, A .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1997, 41 (02) :292-297
[10]   Trends in antimicrobial susceptibility of bacterial pathogens of the respiratory tract [J].
Doern, GV .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1995, 99 :S3-S7