Effect of processing conditions and material properties on the debond fracture toughness of foam-core sandwich composites: experimental optimization

被引:36
作者
Majumdar, P
Srinivasagupta, D
Mahfuz, H [1 ]
Joseph, B
Thomas, MM
Christensen, S
机构
[1] Tuskegee Univ, Ctr Adv Mat, Dept Mech Engn, Chappie James Ctr 103, Tuskegee, AL 36088 USA
[2] Washington Univ, Dept Chem Engn, St Louis, MO 63130 USA
[3] Boeing Co, St Louis, MO 63166 USA
[4] Boeing Co, Seattle, WA 98124 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
resin transfer molding; debonding; fracture toughness; tilted sandwich debond test;
D O I
10.1016/S1359-835X(03)00207-0
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The structural performance and reliability of the foam-core sandwich composites are known to be dependent on the strength of the core-skin bonding. Mechanical tests have repeatedly demonstrated that the failure modes for the sandwich during flexural, compression, and tension loading are first triggered by the failure of the interface or the sub-interface zones between the core and the skin. Once this failure mode sets in, core shear and delamination progress rapidly, leading to the final failure of the sandwich construction. The strength of the core skin bonding depends on the chemical reactions taking place during the cure process. The effect of processing parameters and material properties on the core-skin bonding strength were investigated experimentally. The skin-core debond fracture toughness was measured using Tilted Sandwich Debond specimens. Verifying the heuristics developed in the previous part of this paper [Srinivasagupta et al., Compos. Part A, in press], we achieved a 78% increase in debond fracture toughness with elevated temperature processing, and observed reduced variability with higher suction pressures. We also saw increase in debond fracture toughness with foam density, validating the assumption that interfacial bonding controls the debond fracture toughness. An increase in resin uptake with foam density was an interesting observation from these experiments. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All fights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1097 / 1104
页数:8
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
CARLSSON LA, 2002, RECENT ADV EXPT MECH
[2]   BEHAVIOR OF INTEGRAL COMPOSITE JOINTS FINITE ELEMENT AND EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION [J].
GILLESPIE, JW ;
PIPES, RB .
JOURNAL OF COMPOSITE MATERIALS, 1978, 12 (OCT) :408-421
[3]   Investigation of the role of transverse flow in co-injection resin transfer molding [J].
Gillio, EF ;
Advani, SG ;
Gillespie, JW ;
Fink, BK .
POLYMER COMPOSITES, 1998, 19 (06) :738-746
[4]  
HICKS IA, 1996, SANDWICH CONSTRUCT 3, V1, P579
[5]   Manufacturing and applications of structural sandwich components [J].
Karlsson, KF ;
Astrom, BT .
COMPOSITES PART A-APPLIED SCIENCE AND MANUFACTURING, 1997, 28 (02) :97-111
[6]  
Li X., 1999, J. Sandw. Struct. Mater., DOI [10.1177/109963629900100104, DOI 10.1177/109963629900100104]
[7]   Flow front measurements and model validation in the vacuum assisted resin transfer molding process [J].
Mathur, R ;
Heider, D ;
Hoffmann, C ;
Gillespie, JW ;
Advani, SG ;
Fink, BK .
POLYMER COMPOSITES, 2001, 22 (04) :477-490
[8]   Failure analysis of composite T-joints including inserts [J].
Rispler, AR ;
Steven, GP ;
Tong, LY .
JOURNAL OF REINFORCED PLASTICS AND COMPOSITES, 1997, 16 (18) :1642-1658
[9]   Influence of joint geometry and load regimes on sandwich tee joint behaviour [J].
Shenoi, RA ;
Read, PJCL ;
Jackson, CL .
JOURNAL OF REINFORCED PLASTICS AND COMPOSITES, 1998, 17 (08) :725-740
[10]  
SRINIVASAGUPTA D, IN PRESS COMPOS A