Who should pay for the kids?

被引：46

作者：

England, P ^{[1
]}

Folbre, N

机构：

[1] Univ Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA

[2] Univ Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003 USA

来源：

ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF POLITICAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCE | 1999年 / 563卷

关键词：

D O I：

10.1177/0002716299563001012

中图分类号：

D0 [政治学、政治理论];

学科分类号：

0302 ; 030201 ;

摘要：

This article emphasizes collective struggles over the distribution of the costs of children. Because the production of children's capabilities creates a public good that cannot be priced in the market, individuals can free ride on the efforts of parents in general and mothers in particular. We need to redesign the social contract in ways that encourage more sustainable forms of intergenerational altruism and reciprocity.

引用

页码：194 / 207

页数：14

共 57 条

[11]

CALDWELL J.C., 1982, THEORY FERTILITY DEC, V6

[12] CHILDBEARING AND WIVES FOREGONE EARNINGS [J].

CALHOUN, CA ;

ESPENSHADE, TJ .

POPULATION STUDIES-A JOURNAL OF DEMOGRAPHY, 1988, 42 (01) :5-37

[13]

DAVIS K, 1937, SOCIOL REV, V29, P289, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1467-954X.1937.TB01367.X

[14] RE-LINKING FERTILITY BEHAVIOR AND ECONOMIC-SECURITY IN OLD-AGE - A PRONATALIST REFORM [J].

DEMENY, P .

POPULATION AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW, 1987, 13 (01) :128-132

[15]

Di Stefano C., 1991, CONFIGURATIONS MASCU

[16]

Duncan G.J., 1997, CONSEQUENCES GROWING

[17] The cost of caring [J].

England, P ;

Folbre, N .

ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF POLITICAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCE, 1999, 561 :39-51

[18]

England P., 1986, HOUSEHOLDS EMPLOYMEN

[19]

ENGLAND P, 1997, ANN M AM SOC ASS

[20] The future of the elephant-bird [J].

Folbre, N .

POPULATION AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW, 1997, 23 (03) :647-654

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 →