A clinical phase I and pharmacokinetic study of BBR 2778, a novel anthracenedione analogue, administered intravenously, 3 weekly

被引:33
作者
Dawson, LK
Jodrell, DI [1 ]
Bowman, A
Rye, R
Byrne, B
Bernareggi, A
Camboni, G
机构
[1] Western Gen Hosp, Imperial Canc Res Fund, Med Oncol Unit, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Novuspharma SpA, I-20052 Monza, Italy
关键词
BBR; 2778; phase I; pharmacokinetics;
D O I
10.1016/S0959-8049(00)00342-7
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The anthracenedione analogue, BBR 2778 is an active antitumour agent preclinically and has reduced potential for cardiotoxicity compared with other similar drugs in preclinical models. BBR 2778 was administered 3 weekly by a 1 h intravenous (i.v.) infusion to 24 patients and the dose escalated rapidly from 20 to 240 mg/m(2). The dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was neutropenia, common toxicity criteria (CTC) grade 4 in 3/5 patients at 240 mg/m2. Other toxicities greater than or equal to CTC grade 3 were: vomiting, lymphopenia, thrombocytopenia and lethargy. Blue discoloration of veins and urine was also noted. In 1 patient (120 mg/m(2), four cycles) left ventricular ejection reaction (LVEF) fell (CTC grade 2) but with no clinical sequelae. BBR 2778 plasma pharmacokinetics were biphasic (mean t(1/2)beta at 180 mg/m(2)-14.1 h) and the urinary elimination of the unchanged drug was < 10%. In a patient with previously treated small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC), a 49% reduction in measurable disease was noted with resolution of pericardial and pleural effusions (120 mg/m(2) x eight cycles). From the results of this phase I study a dose of 180 mg/m(2) as a 1 h infusion every 3 weeks would be recommended for phase II trials. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2353 / 2359
页数:7
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
BERTAZZOLI C, 1979, CANCER TREAT REP, V63, P1877
[2]   ADRIAMYCIN - NEW ANTICANCER DRUG WITH SIGNIFICANT CLINICAL ACTIVITY [J].
BLUM, RH ;
CARTER, SK .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1974, 80 (02) :249-259
[3]  
BUNN PA, 1986, SEMIN ONCOL, V13, P45
[4]  
CAVALLETTI E, 1993, P ANN M AM ASS CANC, V34, pA2227
[5]  
CORTES EP, 1974, CANCER, V34, P518, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(197409)34:3<518::AID-CNCR2820340307>3.0.CO
[6]  
2-P
[7]   What is the effect of adjusting epirubicin doses for body surface area? [J].
Dobbs, NA ;
Twelves, CJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1998, 78 (05) :662-666
[8]   Factors affecting epirubicin pharmacokinetics and toxicity: Evidence against using body-surface area for dose calculation [J].
Gurney, HP ;
Ackland, S ;
Gebski, V ;
Farrell, G .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1998, 16 (07) :2299-2304
[9]   ASSESSMENT OF RESPONSE TO THERAPY IN ADVANCED BREAST-CANCER - PROJECT OF PROGRAM ON CLINICAL ONCOLOGY OF "INTERNATIONAL-UNION-AGAINST-CANCER, GENEVA, SWITZERLAND [J].
HAYWARD, JL ;
RUBENS, RD ;
CARBONE, PP ;
HEUSON, JC ;
KUMAOKA, S ;
SEGALOFF, A .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1977, 35 (03) :292-298
[10]  
KRAMER BS, 1984, CANCER TREAT REP, V68, P1295