Racial and ethnic differences in breast cancer survival - How much is explained by screening, tumor severity, biology, treatment, comorbidities, and demographics?

被引:162
作者
Curtis, Elana [1 ]
Quale, Chris [2 ,3 ]
Haggstrorn, David [5 ,6 ]
Smith-Bindman, Rebecca [2 ,3 ,4 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Auckland, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Auckland 1, New Zealand
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Radiol, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[4] Indiana Univ, Sch Med, Regenstrief Inst, Indianapolis, IN 46204 USA
[5] Richard L Roudebush Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Indianapolis, IN USA
[6] Richard L Roudebush Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Indianapolis, IN USA
[7] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Med, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
关键词
breast cancer; survival; race/ethnicity; mammography screening; tumor severity; biology; treatment; comorbidities; demographics;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.23131
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND. The reasons for race/ethnicity (R/E) differences in breast cancer survival have been difficult to disentangle. METHODS. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare data were used to identify 41,020 women aged >= 68 years with incident breast cancer between 1994-1999 including African American (2479), Hispanic (1172), Asian/Pacific Island (1086), and white women (35,878). A Cox proportional hazards model assessed overall and stage-specific (0/1, II/III, and IV) R/E differences in breast cancer survival after adjusting for mammography screening, tumor characteristics at diagnosis, biologic markers, treatment, comorbidity, and demographics. RESULTS. African American women had worse survival than white women, although controlling for predictor variables reduced this difference among all stage breast cancer (hazards ratio [HR], 1.08; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.97-1.20). Adjustment for predictors reduced, but did not eliminate, disparities in the analysis limited to women diagnosed with stage II/III disease (HR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.10-1.54). Screening mammography, tumor characteristics at diagnosis, biologic markers, and treatment each produced a similar reduction in HRs for women with stage II/III cancers. Asian and Pacific Island women had better survival than white women before and after accounting for all predictors (adjusted all stages HR, 0.61 [95% Cl, 0.47-0.79]; adjusted stage II/III HR, 0.61 [95% Cl, 0.47-0.79]). Hispanic women had better survival than white women in all and stage II/III analysis (all stage HR, 0.88; 95% Cl, 0.75-1.04) and stage II/III analysis (HR, 0.88; 95% Cl, 0.75-1.04), although these findings did not reach statistical significance. There was no significant difference in survival by R/E noted among women diagnosed with stage IV disease. CONCLUSIONS. Predictor variables contribute to, but do not fully explain, R/E differences in breast cancer survival for elderly American women. Future analyses should further investigate the role of biology, demographics, and disparities in quality of care.
引用
收藏
页码:171 / 180
页数:10
相关论文
共 54 条
  • [11] 2-P
  • [12] Accuracy and completeness of medicare claims data for surgical treatment of breast cancer
    Du, XL
    Freeman, JL
    Warren, JL
    Nattinger, AB
    Zhang, D
    Goodwin, JS
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 2000, 38 (07) : 719 - 727
  • [13] Infiltrating ductal carcinoma of the breast: The survival impact of race
    Edwards, MJ
    Gamel, JW
    Vaughan, WP
    Wrightson, WR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1998, 16 (08) : 2693 - 2699
  • [14] FREEMAN H, 1997, CANCER J SCI AM, P76
  • [15] Breast cancer screening and health behaviors among African American and Caribbean women in New York City
    Garbers, S
    Chiasson, MA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE FOR THE POOR AND UNDERSERVED, 2006, 17 (01) : 37 - 46
  • [16] Trends in breast cancer by race and ethnicity
    Ghafoor, A
    Jemal, A
    Ward, E
    Cokkinides, V
    Smith, R
    Thun, M
    [J]. CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2003, 53 (06) : 342 - 355
  • [17] CONCORDANCE OF SELF-REPORTED DATA AND MEDICAL RECORD AUDIT FOR 6 CANCER SCREENING PROCEDURES
    GORDON, NP
    HIATT, RA
    LAMPERT, DI
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1993, 85 (07) : 566 - 570
  • [18] Differences in the quality of breast cancer care among vulnerable populations
    Haggstrom, DA
    Quale, C
    Smith-Bindman, R
    [J]. CANCER, 2005, 104 (11) : 2347 - 2358
  • [19] Histologic grade, stage, and survival in breast carcinoma
    Henson, DE
    Chu, KC
    Levine, PH
    [J]. CANCER, 2003, 98 (05) : 908 - 917
  • [20] Institute of Medicine, 2003, UNEQUAL TREATMENT CO