Evidence-based guidelines for fixing broken hips: an update

被引:63
作者
Chilov, MN
Cameron, ID
March, LM
机构
[1] Concord Repatriat Gen Hosp, Concord, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Fac Med, No Clin Sch, Rehabil Studies Unit, Ryde, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Sydney, Fac Med, No Clin Sch, Inst Bone & Mineral Res, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.5694/j.1326-5377.2003.tb05653.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To update evidence-based guidelines for the treatment of proximal femoral fractures published in the Journal in 1999. Data sources: Systematic literature search of MEDLINE, CINAHL and EMBASE from January 1996 to September 2001 and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (most recent issue searched - Issue 2, 2002). Study selection: Randomised controlled trials and meta-analyses of all aspects of acute-care hospital treatment and rehabilitation of proximal femoral fractures among subjects aged 50 years and over with proximal femoral fractures not associated with metastatic disease or multiple trauma. Data extraction: All studies were read independently by two reviewers. Reviewers recorded individual study results, and an assessment of study quality and treatment conclusions according to Cochrane Collaboration protocols. If necessary, a third review was performed to reach consensus. Results: 93 new studies were identified and 82 met our inclusion criteria. Recommendations for thromboprophylaxis, anaesthesia, surgical fixation of fractures and nutritional status have been altered to incorporate new evidence. Recommendations have been added regarding postoperative blood transfusion, the management of subtrochanteric fractures, and the type of surgical swabs which should be used. Conclusions: Although there have been few significant changes to the previous recommendations, updating the guidelines has required substantial effort. The common clinical problem of hip fracture should be treated according to the most up-to-date evidence to achieve the best possible outcomes and optimal utilisation of limited resources. Guideline updates also require resourcing.
引用
收藏
页码:489 / 493
页数:5
相关论文
共 120 条
[51]   Risks and benefits of prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism in orthopaedic surgery [J].
Gillespie, W ;
Murray, D ;
Gregg, PJ ;
Warwick, D .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2000, 82B (04) :475-479
[52]  
GILLESPIE WJ, 2002, COCHRANE DATABASE SY
[53]  
Graupe F, 1996, Unfallchirurgie, V22, P223, DOI 10.1007/BF02641224
[54]   Thromboembolic prophylaxis in orthopaedic trauma patients: A comparison between a fixed dose and an individually adjusted dose of a low molecular weight heparin (nadroparin calcium) [J].
Haentjens, P .
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 1996, 27 (06) :385-390
[55]  
Handoll HH., 1996, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, V2021, P305, DOI [10.1002/14651858.CD000305, DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD000305]
[56]   Use of an intramedullary hip-screw compared with a compression hip-screw with a plate for intertrochanteric femoral fractures - A prospective, randomized study of one hundred patients [J].
Hardy, DCR ;
Descamps, PY ;
Krallis, P ;
Fabeck, L ;
Smets, P ;
Bertens, CL ;
Delince, PE .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1998, 80A (05) :618-630
[57]   Pressure sores and tube feeding in patients with a fracture of the hip:: a randomized clinical trial [J].
Hartgrink, HH ;
Wille, J ;
König, P ;
Hermans, J ;
Breslau, PJ .
CLINICAL NUTRITION, 1998, 17 (06) :287-292
[58]   Hip fractures in Finland and Great Britain - a comparison of patient characteristics and outcomes [J].
Heikkinen, T ;
Parker, M ;
Jalovaara, P .
INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2001, 25 (06) :349-354
[59]  
Hoerer Dori, 1993, Bulletin Hospital for Joint Diseases, V53, P29
[60]   Intertrochanteric fractures of the femur: A randomized prospective comparison of the gamma nail and the Ambi hip screw [J].
Hoffman, CW ;
Lynskey, TG .
AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1996, 66 (03) :151-155