Correlation of minute (0.5 mm or less) focus of prostate adenocarcinoma on needle biopsy with radical prostatectomy specimen: Role of prostate specific antigen density

被引:85
作者
Allan, RW
Sanderson, H
Epstein, JI
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Pathol, Baltimore, MD 21231 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Urol, Baltimore, MD 21231 USA
关键词
prostate; prostatic neoplasms; predictive value of tests; biopsy; needle; prostatectomy;
D O I
10.1097/01.ju.0000074747.72993.cb
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Few studies have examined the radical prostatectomy followup of a minute focus of adenocarcinoma on prostate needle core biopsy. Materials and Methods: We searched the surgical pathology data base (1999 to 2000) for patients with a minute focus of Gleason score 6 adenocarcinoma (defined as a single focus less than or equal to a 40 x microscopic field) who subsequently underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy at our institution. Potentially insignificant tumors were defined as those with a radical prostatectomy tumor volume of less than 0.5 cc, Gleason score 6 or less and organ confined disease. Results: A total of 54 patients (mean age 58 years, range 45 to 70) were evaluated. The average number of prostate cores per biopsy was 6.3. All had Gleason score 6 by study design. Mean prostate specific antigen (PSA) was 6.0 (range 0.8 to 15). Average tumor volume at radical prostatectomy was 0.39 cc. Of the 54 tumors 24 (44%) were 0.1 cc or less. Two-thirds of the tumors were clinically potentially insignificant. Using a PSA density (PSAD) cutoff of 0.15 we identified 30 of 36 patients (83%) with potentially insignificant tumors. Of those with a PSAD of 0.15 or less with clinically significant tumors, 5 of 6 still had relatively small, organ confined tumors with Gleason score less than 7. Conclusions: In the era of PSA screening most patients with a minute focus of Gleason score 6 or less adenocarcinoma on needle biopsy had potentially insignificant tumors. However, one-third of patients had clinically significant tumors warranting definitive therapy. The smallest focus of cancer on needle biopsy is not a guarantee of a clinically insignificant tumor. PSAD may have some value within this group in guiding clinicians and patients as to the likelihood of having clinically insignificant tumors.
引用
收藏
页码:370 / 372
页数:3
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
Bruce RG, 1996, UROLOGY, V48, P75
[2]   Prospective evaluation of men with stage T1c adenocarcinoma of the prostate [J].
Carter, HB ;
Sauvageot, J ;
Walsh, PC ;
Epstein, JI .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 157 (06) :2206-2209
[3]   THE VOLUME OF PROSTATE-CANCER IN THE BIOPSY SPECIMEN CANNOT RELIABLY PREDICT THE QUANTITY OF CANCER IN THE RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY SPECIMEN ON AN INDIVIDUAL BASIS [J].
CUPP, MR ;
BOSTWICK, DG ;
MYERS, RP ;
OESTERLING, JE .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1995, 153 (05) :1543-1548
[4]  
D'Amico AV, 2000, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V89, P1810, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(20001015)89:8<1810::AID-CNCR22>3.0.CO
[5]  
2-9
[6]   Increasing incidence of minimal residual cancer in radical prostatectomy specimens [J].
DiGiuseppe, JA ;
Sauvageot, J ;
Epstein, JI .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 1997, 21 (02) :174-178
[7]   PATHOLOGICAL AND CLINICAL FINDINGS TO PREDICT TUMOR EXTENT OF NONPALPABLE (STAGE-T1C) PROSTATE-CANCER [J].
EPSTEIN, JI ;
WALSH, PC ;
CARMICHAEL, M ;
BRENDLER, CB .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1994, 271 (05) :368-374
[8]   The pathological interpretation and significance of prostate needle biopsy findings: Implications and current controversies [J].
Epstein, JI ;
Potter, SR .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 166 (02) :402-410
[9]  
HUMPHREY PA, 1995, CANCER, V75, P1842, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19950401)75:7+<1842::AID-CNCR2820751614>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-2