Comparison of low-dose with standard-dose multidetector CT in cervical spine trauma

被引:65
作者
Mulkens, T. H.
Marchal, P.
Daineffe, S.
Salgado, R.
Bellinck, P.
te Rijdt, B.
Kegelaers, B.
Termote, J-L
机构
[1] Heilig Hart Ziekenhuis, Dept Radiol, B-2500 Lier, Belgium
[2] Heilig Hart Ziekenhuis, Dept Neurosurg, B-2500 Lier, Belgium
关键词
D O I
10.3174/ajnr.A0608
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The purpose of this work was to evaluate the possible use of low-dose multidetector CT WDCT) in cervical clearance of patients with blunt trauma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 191 patients underwent cervical spine MDCT with 6- and 16-MDCT: standard-dose In = 51) and low-dose MDCT with tube current modulation at high In = 70) and low In = 70) tube voltage (kilovolts). Effective dose, image noise, and subjective image quality were calculated in all of the patients. RESULTS: MDCT found 18 patients (9.4%) with a cervical spine fracture, 3 in the standard-dose and 15 in the low-dose group, 14 of them with unstable lesions, Tube current modulation reduced the dose by 50%-61 % in all of the low-dose examinations. The mean effective dose was 3.75,1.57, and 1.08 mSv, and mean image noise was 14.82, 17.46, and 19.72 Hounsfield units for standard dose and low dose with high and low kilovolt examinations, respectively. These differences in mean effective dose and image noise were significant between the 3 examination groups (Kruskal-Wallis test: P <.0001 and P =.0001). Evaluation of subjective image quality by 2 radiologists and 2 residents showed no significant difference in image quality score among the 3 examination groups (Kruskal-Wallis tests, P =.61,.32,.18, and.31). All of the reviewers correctly detected 18 fractures, except 1 resident, who missed 3 fractures. CONCLUSION: Low-dose cervical spine MDCT in patients with blunt trauma gives a substantial dose reduction of 61 %-71 %, compared with standard-dose MDCT, with a small increase in image noise and without difference in subjective image quality evaluation.
引用
收藏
页码:1444 / 1450
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]
Spiral computed tomography for the initial evaluation of spine trauma: A new standard of care? [J].
Antevil, Jared L. ;
Sise, Michael J. ;
Sack, Daniel I. ;
Kidder, Brendan ;
Hopper, Andrew ;
Brown, Carlos V. R. .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2006, 61 (02) :382-387
[2]
Value of multiplanar reformations (MPR) in multidetector CT (MDCT) of acute vertebral fractures - Do we still have to read the transverse images? [J].
Begemann, PGC ;
Kemper, J ;
Gatzka, C ;
Stork, A ;
Nolte-Ernsting, C ;
Adam, G .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2004, 28 (04) :572-580
[3]
Helical computed tomographic scanning for the evaluation of the cervical spine in the unconscious, intubated trauma patient [J].
Brohi, K ;
Healy, M ;
Fotheringham, T ;
Chan, O ;
Aylwin, C ;
Whitley, S ;
Walsh, M .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2005, 58 (05) :897-901
[4]
Computed tomography for cervical spine trauma. The impact of MDCT on fracture detection and dose deposition [J].
Chan P.N. ;
Antonio G.E. ;
Griffith J.F. ;
Yu K.W. ;
Rainer T.H. ;
Ahuja A.T. .
Emergency Radiology, 2005, 11 (5) :286-290
[5]
Cooper D J, 2005, Crit Care Resusc, V7, P181
[6]
Are five-view plain films of the cervical spine unreliable? A prospective evaluation in blunt trauma patients with altered mental status [J].
Diaz, JJ ;
Gillman, C ;
Morris, JA ;
May, AK ;
Carrillo, YM ;
Guy, J .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2003, 55 (04) :658-663
[7]
The inefficiency of plain radiography to evaluate the cervical spine after blunt trauma [J].
Gale, SC ;
Gracias, VH ;
Reilly, PM ;
Schwab, CW .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2005, 59 (05) :1121-1125
[8]
Role of clinical examination in screening for blunt cervical spine injury [J].
Gonzalez, RP ;
Fried, PO ;
Bukhalo, M ;
Holevar, MR ;
Falimirski, ME .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 1999, 189 (02) :152-157
[9]
Dose reduction in computed tomography by attenuation-based on-line modulation of tube current: evaluation of six anatomical regions [J].
Greess, H ;
Wolf, H ;
Baum, U ;
Lell, M ;
Pirkl, M ;
Kalender, W ;
Bautz, WA .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2000, 10 (02) :391-394
[10]
Radiographic clearance of blunt cervical spine injury: Plain radiograph or computed tomography scan? [J].
Griffen, MM ;
Frykberg, ER ;
Kerwin, AJ ;
Schinco, MA ;
Tepas, JJ ;
Rowe, K ;
Abboud, J .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2003, 55 (02) :222-226