Value of multiplanar reformations (MPR) in multidetector CT (MDCT) of acute vertebral fractures - Do we still have to read the transverse images?

被引:34
作者
Begemann, PGC
Kemper, J
Gatzka, C
Stork, A
Nolte-Ernsting, C
Adam, G
机构
[1] Univ Hamburg, Hosp Eppendorf, Dept Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
[2] Univ Hamburg, Hosp Eppendorf, Dept Trauma Hand & Reconctruct Surg, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
关键词
computed tomography; MDCT; MPR; vertebral fracture; multiplanar reformations;
D O I
10.1097/00004728-200407000-00023
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100207 [影像医学与核医学]; 1009 [特种医学];
摘要
Objective: To determine the value of multiplanar reformations (MPRs) in multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) diagnosis of acute vertebral fractures and to assess the necessity to read the whole set of transverse images. Methods: Retrospectively, 56 MDCT of 55 patients with acute vertebral fractures were included. The images were analyzed by two radiologists in a consensus procedure. First, the diagnosis was made exclusively from sagittal and coronal MPRs; secondly, the transverse images were analyzed with knowledge of the MPRs. Diagnostic accuracy is given as percentage. Image amounts were compared using the Wilcoxon test. Results: In 244 vertebral bodies, all 70 fractured vertebrae were diagnosed on reviewing MPRs only. There were no false positive cases. In 2/70 fractures, the anatomically exact diagnosis was complemented by reading the transverse images. Forty-two of 43 unstable fractures were diagnosed correctly on MPRs only. With preference of MPR reading, the total number of images to be analyzed could be reduced significantly (P < 0.01). Conclusion: Reading of MPRs alone is a feasible approach for correct assessment of vertebral fractures and classifying them into stable/unstable, if MPRs are done properly. Transverse images must be analyzed in complex fractures or uncertain findings.
引用
收藏
页码:572 / 580
页数:9
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]
DENIS F, 1984, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P65
[2]
Stair-step artifacts with single versus multiple detector-row helical CT [J].
Fleischmann, D ;
Rubin, GD ;
Paik, DS ;
Yen, SY ;
Hilfiker, PR ;
Beaulieu, CF ;
Napel, S .
RADIOLOGY, 2000, 216 (01) :185-196
[3]
New technical developments in multislice CT - Part 1: Approaching isotropic resolution with sub-millimeter 16-slice scanning [J].
Flohr, T ;
Stierstorfer, K ;
Bruder, H ;
Simon, J ;
Schaller, S .
ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2002, 174 (07) :839-845
[4]
Flohr TH, 2001, MULTISLICE CT: A PRACTICAL GUIDE, P7
[5]
Computed tomography practice Germany - Results of a national survey in 1999 - Preface [J].
Galanski, M ;
Nagel, HD ;
Stamm, G .
ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2001, 173 (10) :R1-R1
[6]
Comparison of quality of multiplanar reconstructions and direct coronal multidetector CT scans of the lung [J].
Honda, O ;
Johkoh, T ;
Yamamoto, S ;
Koyama, M ;
Tomiyama, N ;
Kozuka, T ;
Hamada, S ;
Mihara, N ;
Nakamura, H ;
Müller, NL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2002, 179 (04) :875-879
[7]
Traumatic injuries:: imaging of spinal injuries [J].
Imhof, H ;
Fuchsjäger, M .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2002, 12 (06) :1262-1272
[8]
THIN-SECTION 3-DIMENSIONAL SPIRAL CT - IS ISOTROPIC IMAGING POSSIBLE [J].
KALENDER, WA .
RADIOLOGY, 1995, 197 (03) :578-580
[9]
Klöppel R, 2002, RADIOLOGE, V42, P541, DOI 10.1007/s00117-002-0764-8
[10]
Linsenmaier U, 2002, RADIOLOGE, V42, P533, DOI 10.1007/s00117-002-0763-9