Number and characteristics of breast cancer cases diagnosed in four periods in the screening interval of a biennial population-based screening programme

被引:15
作者
Hofvind, Solveig [1 ]
Bjurstam, Nils
Sorum, Ragnhild
Bjorndal, Hilde
Thoresen, Steinar
Skaane, Per
机构
[1] Canc Registry Norway, N-0310 Oslo, Norway
[2] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, S-41345 Gothenburg, Sweden
[3] Univ N Norway, Tromso, Norway
[4] Norwegian Radium Hosp, Oslo, Norway
[5] Univ Oslo, Ulleval Hosp, Oslo, Norway
关键词
D O I
10.1177/096914130601300406
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective To describe the distribution and prognostic tumour characteristics of interval breast cancers diagnosed in four periods after index screen (1-6, 7-12, 13-18 and 19+ months) in a population-based screening programme inviting women aged 50-69 years to biennial screening. Setting The Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Programme (NBCSP) Methods In all, 848 interval breast cancer cases were diagnosed in 437,235 screening examinations. The distribution and prognostic tumour characteristics of the interval cancers diagnosed in four periods in the screening interval will be described. Proportions and rates will be compared by chi(2)-test. Results A total of 70% of the interval cancers in the NBCSP were diagnosed in the second year of the interval. Except for tumour size (P=0.027), we found no evidence of adverse prognostic breast characteristics (grade, lymph node involvement, oestrogen and progesterone receptor positive) in invasive tumours diagnosed during the second versus the first year of the screening interval (Chi square P > 0.05 for all). The prognostic characteristics of the tumours did not differ by age groups. It was a decreasing interval cancer rate per 10,000 women-years by age. Conclusion The risk of interval cancer increases by time after index screen, and 70% of the interval cancers in the NBCSP were diagnosed in the second year of the interval. Prognostic histological tumour characteristics did not differ by time after index screen, thus mean sojourn time (tumour growth rate) seems important for stating an optimal screening interval in a population-based screening programme.
引用
收藏
页码:192 / 196
页数:5
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
*ACR BI RADS COMM, 2003, BIRADS BREAST IM REP
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2002, IARC Handbook of Cancer Prevention
[3]  
Breast Screening Frequency Trial Group, 2002, Eur J Cancer, V38, P1458
[4]   Factors contributing to mammography failure in women aged 40-49 years [J].
Buist, DSM ;
Porter, PL ;
Lehman, C ;
Taplin, SH ;
White, E .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2004, 96 (19) :1432-1440
[5]   Predicting the cumulative risk of false-positive mammograms [J].
Christiansen, CL ;
Wang, F ;
Barton, MB ;
Kreuter, W ;
Elmore, JG ;
Gelfand, AE ;
Fletcher, SW .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2000, 92 (20) :1657-1666
[6]  
DAY N, 1995, J MED SCREEN, V2, P185
[7]   Mammographic screening in women more than 64 years old: A comparison of 1- and 2-year intervals [J].
Field, LR ;
Wilson, TE ;
Strawderman, M ;
Gabriel, H ;
Helvie, MA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1998, 170 (04) :961-965
[8]   Interval cancers in the Dutch breast cancer screening programme [J].
Fracheboud, J ;
de Koning, HJ ;
Beemsterboer, PMM ;
Boer, R ;
Verbeek, ALM ;
Hendriks, JHCL ;
van Ineveld, BM ;
Broeders, MJM ;
de Bruyn, AE ;
van der Maas, PJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1999, 81 (05) :912-917
[9]  
HAKAMA M, 1995, LANCET, V345, P221
[10]   Do the results of the process indicators in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program predict future mortality reduction from breast cancer? [J].
Hofvind, S ;
Wang, H ;
Thoresen, S .
ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2004, 43 (05) :467-473