Cetirizine and loratadine:: a comparison using the ED50 in skin reactions

被引:11
作者
Ramboer, I
Bumbacea, R
Lazarescu, D
Radu, JR
机构
[1] UCB SA, Pharma Sector, B-1420 Braine Alleud, Belgium
[2] Malaxa Hosp, Bucharest, Romania
关键词
cetirizine; loratadine; antihistamines; skin reactions; histamine prick test; ED50;
D O I
10.1177/147323000002800202
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
To quantify objectively the comparative potencies of the antihistamines, loratadine and cetirizine, we determined the dose that inhibits histamine-induced skin reactions by 50% of the maximum response (ED50) for each drug. Cetirizine at 2.5, 5 or 10 mg, loratadine at 10, 20 or 40 mg or placebo were given to 14 healthy female subjects in a randomized double-blind crossover design. Inhibition of the wheal and flare response to the histamine prick test (10, 100 and 500 mg/ml) was evaluated. Depending on the histamine concentrations, the ED50 for wheals were in the ranges 4.3 - 4.7, 2.1 - 2.2 and 1.7 - 1.9 mg cetirizine, 2, 4 and 6 h after dosing, respectively. For loratadine, the ED50 for wheals were in the ranges 35.6 - > 40, 9.1 - 24.1 and 9.1 - 13.9 mg, 2, 4 and 6 h after dosing, respectively. Calculation of the ED50 demonstrated that, on average, cetirizine is seven to nine times more potent than loratadine at inhibiting wheal and flare reactions.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 77
页数:9
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]   PHARMACOLOGIC MODULATION BY CETIRIZINE 2 HCL AND LORATADINE OF THE HISTAMINE-INDUCED SKIN REACTION IN MICE AND IN HUMANS [J].
COULIE, P ;
DEVOS, C ;
GHYS, L ;
RIHOUX, JP .
DRUG DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH, 1989, 17 (03) :199-206
[2]   PHARMACOLOGICAL MODULATION BY CETIRIZINE AND LORATADINE OF ANTIGEN AND HISTAMINE-INDUCED SKIN WEALS AND FLARES, AND LATE ACCUMULATION OF EOSINOPHILS [J].
FADEL, R ;
HERPINRICHARD, N ;
DUFRESNE, F ;
RIHOUX, JP .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 1990, 18 (05) :366-371
[3]   A double-blind, single-dose, crossover comparison of cetirizine, ebastine, epinastine, fexofenadine, terfenadine, and loratadine versus placebo: suppression of histamine-induced wheal and flare response for 24 h in [J].
Grant, JA ;
Danielson, L ;
Rihoux, JP ;
DeVos, C .
ALLERGY, 1999, 54 (07) :700-707
[4]   THE EFFECTS OF ASTEMIZOLE, CETIRIZINE AND LORATADINE ON THE TIME COURSE OF WEAL AND FLARE REACTIONS TO HISTAMINE, CODEINE AND ANTIGEN [J].
HUMPHREYS, F ;
HUNTER, JAA .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 1991, 125 (04) :364-367
[5]   A COMPARISON OF THE PHARMACODYNAMICS OF H-1-RECEPTOR ANTAGONISTS AS ASSESSED BY THE INDUCED WHEAL-AND-FLARE MODEL [J].
JUHLIN, L .
ALLERGY, 1995, 50 (24) :24-30
[6]   SUPPRESSION OF HISTAMINE-INDUCED SKIN REACTIONS BY LORATADINE AND CETIRIZINE DIHCL [J].
KONTOUFILI, K ;
PALEOLOGOS, G ;
HERAKLEOUS, M .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1989, 36 (06) :617-619
[7]  
LEVER LR, 1992, SKIN PHARMACOL, V5, P29
[8]   Comparison between nasal provocation tests and skin tests in patients treated with loratadine and cetirizine [J].
Persi, L ;
Demoly, P ;
Harris, AG ;
Tisserand, B ;
Michel, FB ;
Bousquet, J .
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1999, 103 (04) :591-594
[9]   QUANTITATIVE-DETERMINATION OF SKIN REACTIVITY BY 2 SEMIAUTOMATIC DEVICES FOR SKIN PRICK TEST AREA MEASUREMENTS [J].
POULSEN, LK ;
BINDSLEVJENSEN, C ;
RIHOUX, JP .
AGENTS AND ACTIONS, 1994, 41 :C134-C135
[10]  
RIHOUX JP, 1990, ANN ALLERGY, V65, P139