New Indices in Scholarship Assessment

被引：67

作者：

Thompson, Dennis F. ^{[1
]}

Callen, Erin C.

Nahata, Milap C. ^{[2
,3
]}

机构：

[1] SW Oklahoma State Univ, Dept Pharm Practice, Coll Pharm, Oklahoma City, OK 73103 USA

[2] Ohio State Univ, Coll Pharm, Columbus, OH 43210 USA

[3] Ohio State Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Pharm, Columbus, OH 43210 USA

来源：

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL EDUCATION | 2009年 / 73卷 / 06期

关键词：

research; literature; scholarship; assessment; evaluation; H-INDEX; BIBLIOMETRIC INDICATORS; SCIENTIFIC-RESEARCH; JOURNAL IMPACT; PHARMACY; FACULTY; SCIENCE; RESEARCHERS; COLLEGES; RANKING;

D O I：

10.5688/aj7306111

中图分类号：

G40 [教育学];

学科分类号：

040101 ; 120403 ;

摘要：

Faculty members' contributions to research and scholarship are measured by a variety of indices. Assessment also has become an integral part of the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education's accreditation process for professional programs. This review describes some of the newer indices available for faculty scholarship assessment. Recently described metrics include the h-index, m-quotient, g-index, h(2) index, a-index, m-index, r-index, ar index, and the creativity index. Of the newer scholarship metrics available, the h-index and m-quotient will likely have the most widespread application in the near future. However, there is no substitute for thoughtful peer review by experienced academicians as the primary method of research and scholarship assessment.

引用

页数：5

共 41 条

[1]

American Council on Pharmaceutical Education, 2006, ACCR STAND GUID PROF

[2]

[Anonymous], 2006, Sci Focus, DOI DOI 10.1209/0295-5075/78/30002

[3] Applying successive H indices in the institutional evaluation:: A case study [J].

Arencibia-Jorge, Ricardo ;

Barrios-Almaguer, Ismaray ;

Fernandez-Hernandez, Sandra ;

Carvajal-Espino, Rachel .

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 59 (01) :155-157

[4] Does the h-index for ranking of scientists really work? [J].

Bornmann, L ;

Daniel, HD .

SCIENTOMETRICS, 2005, 65 (03) :391-392

[5] Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the h index?: a comparison of nine different variants of the h index using data from biomedicine [J].

Bornmann, Lutz ;

Mutz, Ruediger ;

Daniel, Hans-Dieter .

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 59 (05) :830-837

[6] Finding and Using Readily Available Sources of Assessment Data [J].

Boyce, Eric G. .

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL EDUCATION, 2008, 72 (05)

[7] On the h-index, the size of the Hirsch core and Jin's A-index [J].

Burrell, Quentin L. .

JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2007, 1 (02) :170-177

[8] Number and impact of published scholarly works by pharmacy practice faculty members at accredited US colleges and schools of pharmacy (2001-2003) [J].

Coleman, Craig I. ;

Schlesselman, Lauren S. ;

Lao, Eang ;

White, C. Michael .

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL EDUCATION, 2007, 71 (03)

[9] The h-index: Advantages, limitations and its relation with other bibliometric indicators at the micro level [J].

Costas, Rodrigo ;

Bordons, Maria .

JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2007, 1 (03) :193-203

[10] Theory and practise of the g-index [J].

Egghe, Leo .

SCIENTOMETRICS, 2006, 69 (01) :131-152

← 1 2 3 4 5 →