Earthquake hazards and community resilience in Baluchistan

被引:125
作者
Ainuddin, Syed [1 ,2 ]
Routray, Jayant Kumar [1 ]
机构
[1] Asian Inst Technol, Bangkok 12120, Thailand
[2] Univ Baluchistan, Fac Earth & Environm Sci Geog, Quetta, Pakistan
关键词
Earthquake; Community resilience; Disasters; Baluchistan; VULNERABILITY; FRAMEWORK; ADAPTATION; PREPAREDNESS; MEGACITIES; CAPACITY; METAPHOR;
D O I
10.1007/s11069-012-0201-x
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Resilience is widely used from a variety of research perspectives; however, community resilience in particular is applied to a number of natural hazards and disasters-related studies, programs, and activities. It is also acknowledged that its measurement is cumbersome but not impossible. The prime objective of this paper is to measure the community resilience of an earthquake-prone area in Baluchistan. The article presents the concept of resilience, its approaches, selection of indicators, formulation of subjective assessment method for weighting the indicators, and finally, developing the community resilience index. For the community resilience measurement, a survey was conducted among 200 households in two earthquake risk zones of Quetta city, using simple random sampling method. The overall composite community resilience index revealed that the resilience is low in both the zones-A and B. However, it is revealed that there is a significant difference between the zones when compared against the components and indicators. Community resilience components such as economic, institutional, and physical have received higher index values in Zone B as compared to Zone A. Based on the findings, it is recommended to improve the socioeconomic, institutional, and structural (housing) conditions of the community by raising the community awareness and preparedness, implementing building codes, and providing income-generating activities in order to enhance the community resilience to cope up with earthquake hazards in the future.
引用
收藏
页码:909 / 937
页数:29
相关论文
共 108 条
  • [21] Buckle P., 2001, ASSESSING RESILIENCE
  • [22] From metaphor to measurement: Resilience of what to what?
    Carpenter, S
    Walker, B
    Anderies, JM
    Abel, N
    [J]. ECOSYSTEMS, 2001, 4 (08) : 765 - 781
  • [23] Linking global and local scales: designing dynamic assessment and management processes
    Cash, DW
    Moser, SC
    [J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2000, 10 (02): : 109 - 120
  • [24] Biotic control over the functioning of ecosystems
    Chapin, FS
    Walker, BH
    Hobbs, RJ
    Hooper, DU
    Lawton, JH
    Sala, OE
    Tilman, D
    [J]. SCIENCE, 1997, 277 (5325) : 500 - 504
  • [25] Churiwala BL, 2007, INDIAN CHEM ENG, V49, P54
  • [26] Coburn A., 1992, EARTHQUAKE PROTECTIO
  • [27] Cutter LS, 2008, 1 CARRI
  • [28] Social vulnerability to environmental hazards
    Cutter, SL
    Boruff, BJ
    Shirley, WL
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2003, 84 (02) : 242 - 261
  • [29] Revealing the vulnerability of people and places: A case study of Georgetown County, South Carolina
    Cutter, SL
    Mitchell, JT
    Scott, MS
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN GEOGRAPHERS, 2000, 90 (04) : 713 - 737
  • [30] Cutter SL, 2010, J HOMEL SECUR EMERG, V7