Interactions between PD-1 and PD-L1 promote tolerance by blocking the TCR-induced stop signal

被引:665
作者
Fife, Brian T. [1 ,2 ]
Pauken, Kristen E. [2 ]
Eagar, Todd N. [1 ,3 ]
Obu, Takashi [2 ]
Wu, Jenny [1 ]
Tang, Qizhi [1 ,4 ]
Azuma, Miyuki [5 ]
Krummel, Matthew F. [6 ]
Bluestone, Jeffrey A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Med, Ctr Diabet, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Dept Med, Ctr Immunol, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[3] Univ Texas SW, Dept Neurol, Dallas, TX USA
[4] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Surg, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[5] Tokyo Med & Dent Univ, Dept Mol Immunol, Tokyo, Japan
[6] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Pathol, San Francisco, CA USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
T-CELL-ACTIVATION; NONOBESE DIABETIC MICE; LYMPH-NODES; IN-VIVO; DENDRITIC CELLS; NEGATIVE REGULATOR; PROGRAMMED DEATH-1; IMMUNE-SYSTEM; CTLA-4; EXPRESSION;
D O I
10.1038/ni.1790
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
071005 [微生物学]; 100108 [医学免疫学];
摘要
Programmed death 1 (PD-1) is an inhibitory molecule expressed on activated T cells; however, the biological context in which PD-1 controls T cell tolerance remains unclear. Using two-photon laser-scanning microscopy, we show here that unlike naive or activated islet antigen-specific T cells, tolerized islet antigen-specific T cells moved freely and did not swarm around antigen-bearing dendritic cells (DCs) in pancreatic lymph nodes. Inhibition of T cell antigen receptor (TCR)-driven stop signals depended on continued interactions between PD-1 and its ligand, PD-L1, as antibody blockade of PD-1 or PD-L1 resulted in lower T cell motility, enhanced T cell-DC contacts and caused autoimmune diabetes. Blockade of the immunomodulatory receptor CTLA-4 did not alter T cell motility or abrogate tolerance. Thus, PD-1-PD-L1 interactions maintain peripheral tolerance by mechanisms fundamentally distinct from those of CTLA-4.
引用
收藏
页码:1185 / U70
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]
Transcriptional mechanisms underlying lymphocyte tolerance [J].
Macián, F ;
García-Cózar, F ;
Im, SH ;
Horton, HF ;
Byrne, MC ;
Rao, A .
CELL, 2002, 109 (06) :719-731
[32]
T-cell priming by dendritic cells in lymph nodes occurs in three distinct phases [J].
Mempel, TR ;
Henrickson, SE ;
von Andrian, UH .
NATURE, 2004, 427 (6970) :154-159
[33]
Imaging the single cell dynamics of CD4+ T cell activation by dendritic cells in lymph nodes [J].
Miller, MJ ;
Safrina, O ;
Parker, I ;
Cahalan, MD .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2004, 200 (07) :847-856
[34]
Two-photon imaging of lymphocyte motility and antigen response in intact lymph node [J].
Miller, MJ ;
Wei, SH ;
Parker, I ;
Cahalan, MD .
SCIENCE, 2002, 296 (5574) :1869-1873
[35]
Inverse Rap1 and phospho-ERK expression discriminate the maintenance phase of tolerance and priming of antigen-specific CD4+ T cells in vitro and in vivo [J].
Morton, Angela M. ;
McManus, Barbara ;
Garside, Paul ;
Mowat, Allan McI. ;
Harnett, Margaret M. .
JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY, 2007, 179 (12) :8026-8034
[36]
Polarity of T cell shape, motility, and sensitivity to antigen [J].
Negulescu, PA ;
Krasieva, TB ;
Khan, A ;
Kerschbaum, HH ;
Cahalan, MD .
IMMUNITY, 1996, 4 (05) :421-430
[37]
Immunological studies on PD-1-deficient mice: implication of PD-1 as a negative regulator for B cell responses [J].
Nishimura, H ;
Minato, N ;
Nakano, T ;
Honjo, T .
INTERNATIONAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1998, 10 (10) :1563-1572
[38]
Developmentally regulated expression of the PD-1 protein on the surface of double-negative (CD4(-)CD8(-)) thymocytes [J].
Nishimura, H ;
Agata, Y ;
Kawasaki, A ;
Sato, M ;
Imamura, S ;
Minato, N ;
Yagita, H ;
Nakano, T ;
Honjo, T .
INTERNATIONAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1996, 8 (05) :773-780
[39]
CTLA-4 and PD-1 receptors inhibit T-cell activation by distinct mechanisms [J].
Parry, RV ;
Chemnitz, JM ;
Frauwirth, KA ;
Lanfranco, AR ;
Braunstein, I ;
Kobayashi, SV ;
Linsley, PS ;
Thompson, CB ;
Riley, JL .
MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGY, 2005, 25 (21) :9543-9553
[40]
Tyrosine phosphatase SHP-2 binding to CTLA-4: Absence of direct YVKM/YFIP motif recognition [J].
Schneider, H ;
Rudd, CE .
BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2000, 269 (01) :279-283