On the dosimetric behaviour of photon dose calculation algorithms in the presence of simple geometric heterogeneities:: comparison with Monte Carlo calculations

被引:194
作者
Fogliata, Antonella [1 ]
Vanetti, Eugenio
Albers, Dirk
Brink, Carsten
Clivio, Alessandro
Knoos, Tommy
Nicolini, Giorgia
Cozzi, Luca
机构
[1] Oncol Inst So Switzerland, Med Phys Unit, Bellinzona, Switzerland
[2] Univ Milan, Med Phys Specializat Sch, Milan, Italy
[3] Univ Lund Hosp, S-22185 Lund, Sweden
[4] Univ Hamburg, Dept Radiotherapy & Radiooncol, Med Ctr, Hamburg, Germany
[5] Odense Univ Hosp, Lab Radiat Phys, Odense, Denmark
关键词
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/52/5/011
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
A comparative study was performed to reveal differences and relative figures of merit of seven different calculation algorithms for photon beams when applied to inhomogeneous media. The following algorithms were investigated: Varian Eclipse: the anisotropic analytical algorithm, and the pencil beam with modified Batho correction; Nucletron Helax-TMS: the collapsed cone and the pencil beam with equivalent path length correction; CMS XiO: the multigrid superposition and the fast Fourier transform convolution; Philips Pinnacle: the collapsed cone. Monte Carlo simulations ( MC) performed with the EGSnrc codes BEAMnrc and DOSxyznrc from NRCC in Ottawa were used as a benchmark. The study was carried out in simple geometrical water phantoms(rho = 1.00 g cm(-3)) with inserts of different densities simulating light lung tissue (rho = 0.035 g cm(-3)), normal lung (rho = 0.20 g cm(-3)) and cortical bone tissue (rho = 1.80 g cm(-3)). Experiments were performed for low- and high-energy photon beams (6 and 15 MV) and for square (13 x 13 cm(2)) and elongated rectangular (2.8 x 13 cm(2)) fields. Analysis was carried out on the basis of depth dose curves and transverse profiles at several depths. Assuming the MC data as reference,. index analysis was carried out distinguishing between regions inside the non-water inserts or inside the uniformwater. For this study, a distance to agreement was set to 3 mm while the dose difference varied from 2% to 10%. In general all algorithms based on pencil-beam convolutions showed a systematic deficiency in managing the presence of heterogeneous media. In contrast, complicated patterns were observed for the advanced algorithmswith significant discrepancies observed between algorithms in the lighter materials (rho = 0.035 g cm(-3)), enhanced for the most energetic beam. For denser, and more clinical, densities a better agreement among the sophisticated algorithms with respect to MC was observed.
引用
收藏
页码:1363 / 1385
页数:23
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
*AAPM, 2004, 85 AAPM
[2]   ACQUISITION OF THE EFFECTIVE LATERAL ENERGY FLUENCE DISTRIBUTION FOR PHOTON-BEAM DOSE CALCULATIONS BY CONVOLUTION MODELS [J].
AHNESJO, A ;
TREPP, A .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1991, 36 (07) :973-985
[3]   Beam modeling and verification of a photon beam multisource model [J].
Ahnesjö, A ;
Weber, L ;
Murman, A ;
Saxner, M ;
Thorslund, I ;
Traneus, E .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2005, 32 (06) :1722-1737
[4]   A PENCIL BEAM MODEL FOR PHOTON DOSE CALCULATION [J].
AHNESJO, A ;
SAXNER, M ;
TREPP, A .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1992, 19 (02) :263-273
[5]   COLLAPSED CONE CONVOLUTION OF RADIANT ENERGY FOR PHOTON DOSE CALCULATION IN HETEROGENEOUS MEDIA [J].
AHNESJO, A .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1989, 16 (04) :577-592
[6]   Experimental verification of convolution /superposition photon dose calculations for radiotherapy treatment planning [J].
Aspradakis, MM ;
Morrison, RH ;
Richmond, ND ;
Steele, A .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2003, 48 (17) :2873-2893
[7]   Commissioning and quality assurance-of the Pinnacle3 radiotherapy treatment planning system for external beam photons [J].
Bedford, JL ;
Childs, PJ ;
Hansen, VN ;
Mosleh-Shirazi, MA ;
Verhaegen, F ;
Warrington, AP .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2003, 76 (903) :163-176
[8]   Comparison of dose calculation algorithms in phantoms with lung equivalent heterogeneities under conditions of lateral electronic disequilibrium [J].
Carrasco, P ;
Jornet, N ;
Duch, MA ;
Weber, L ;
Ginjaume, M ;
Eudaldo, T ;
Jurado, D ;
Ruiz, A ;
Ribas, M .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2004, 31 (10) :2899-2911
[9]   Clinical comparison of head and neck and prostate IMRT plans using absorbed dose to medium and absorbed dose to water [J].
Dogan, N. ;
Siebers, J. V. ;
Keall, P. J. .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2006, 51 (19) :4967-4980
[10]   Experimental validation tests of fast Fourier transform convolution and multigrid superposition algorithms for dose calculation in low-density media [J].
García-Vicente, F ;
Miñambres, A ;
Jerez, I ;
Modolell, I ;
Pérez, L ;
Torres, JJ .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2003, 67 (02) :239-249