Dynamic MR imaging of liver metastases with Gd-EOB-DTPA

被引:21
作者
Stern, W
Schick, F
Kopp, AF
Reimer, P
Shamsi, K
Claussen, CD
Laniado, M
机构
[1] Univ Tubingen, Dept Diagnost Radiol, D-72076 Tubingen, Germany
[2] Univ Munster, Inst Clin Radiol, D-4400 Munster, Germany
[3] Schering AG, D-1000 Berlin, Germany
关键词
liver; metastases; MR imaging; contrast enhancement;
D O I
10.1080/028418500127345208
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To assess liver and lesion enhancements by dynamic MR imaging after bolus injection of the hepatobiliary contrast agent gadolinium ethoxybenzyldiet- hylenetriamine-pentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA) in patients with liver metastases and to compare the effect of different doses. Material and Method's: A randomized double-blinded trial with doses of 12.5, 25 and 50 mu mol/kg Gd-EOB-DTPA was performed in 35 patients with liver metastases. Liver enhancement, tumor enhancement and liver lesion contrast-to-noise (C/N) ratios were calculated from breath-hold gradient echo images (100/5/80 degrees) recorded precontrast and at different times up to 10 min postcontrast. Results: Normal liver showed a characteristic enhancement pattern, with a rapid enhancement in the first 45 s postcontrast and a slight but significant further increase up to 600 s. The initial enhancement in the lesions was also pronounced, but the enhancement was slightly decreased after 240 s postcontrast. At dose levels of 12.5 and 25 mu mol/kg Gd-EOB-DTPA, C/N ratios significantly increased compared to baseline from 90 to 600 s. Postcontrast C/N-values obtained using 50 mu mol/kg Cd-EOB-DTPA were not significantly increased, except for the examinations 480 s postcontrast. Conclusion: In liver metastases, CIN ratios obtained with doses of 12.5 and 25 mu mol/kg Gd-EOB-DTPA were slightly superior to 50 mu mol/kg Gd-EOB-DTPA. This finding is probably due to a more pronounced extracellular effect of the contrast medium at higher doses.
引用
收藏
页码:255 / 262
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1977, CLIN BIOSTATISTICS
  • [2] HEPATIC METASTASES - BASIC PRINCIPLES AND IMPLICATIONS FOR RADIOLOGISTS
    BAKER, ME
    PELLEY, R
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1995, 197 (02) : 329 - 337
  • [3] Focal malignant hepatic lesions: MR imaging enhanced with gadolinium benzyloxypropionictetra-acetate (BOPTA) - Preliminary results of phase II clinical application
    Caudana, R
    Morana, G
    Pirovano, GP
    Nicoli, N
    Portuese, A
    Spinazzi, A
    DiRito, R
    Pistolesi, GF
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1996, 199 (02) : 513 - 520
  • [4] Contrast agents in magnetic resonance imaging of the liver:: present and future
    Clément, O
    Siauve, N
    Lewin, M
    de Kerviler, E
    Cuénod, CA
    Frija, G
    [J]. BIOMEDICINE & PHARMACOTHERAPY, 1998, 52 (02) : 51 - 58
  • [5] CLEMENT O, 1992, INVEST RADIOL, V27, P612
  • [6] CLEMENT O, 1993, JMRI-J MAGN RESON IM, V3, P1
  • [7] Benign and malignant hepatocellular tumors: evaluation of tumoral enhancement after mangafodipir trisodium injection on MR imaging
    Coffin, CM
    Diche, T
    Mahfouz, AE
    Alexandre, M
    Caseiro-Alves, F
    Rahmouni, A
    Vasile, N
    Mathieu, D
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 1999, 9 (03) : 444 - 449
  • [8] DYNAMIC MR IMAGING OF THE LIVER WITH GD-DTPA - INITIAL CLINICAL-RESULTS
    EDELMAN, RR
    SIEGEL, JB
    SINGER, A
    DUPUIS, K
    LONGMAID, HE
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1989, 153 (06) : 1213 - 1219
  • [9] PRECLINICAL EVALUATION OF MNDPDP - NEW PARAMAGNETIC HEPATOBILIARY CONTRAST AGENT FOR MR IMAGING
    ELIZONDO, G
    FRETZ, CJ
    STARK, DD
    ROCKLAGE, SM
    QUAY, SC
    WORAH, D
    TSANG, YM
    CHEN, MCM
    FERRUCCI, JT
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1991, 178 (01) : 73 - 78
  • [10] Liver-specific MR imaging contrast agents
    Hahn, PF
    Saini, S
    [J]. RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1998, 36 (02) : 287 - +