Dynamic MR imaging of liver metastases with Gd-EOB-DTPA

被引:21
作者
Stern, W
Schick, F
Kopp, AF
Reimer, P
Shamsi, K
Claussen, CD
Laniado, M
机构
[1] Univ Tubingen, Dept Diagnost Radiol, D-72076 Tubingen, Germany
[2] Univ Munster, Inst Clin Radiol, D-4400 Munster, Germany
[3] Schering AG, D-1000 Berlin, Germany
关键词
liver; metastases; MR imaging; contrast enhancement;
D O I
10.1080/028418500127345208
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To assess liver and lesion enhancements by dynamic MR imaging after bolus injection of the hepatobiliary contrast agent gadolinium ethoxybenzyldiet- hylenetriamine-pentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA) in patients with liver metastases and to compare the effect of different doses. Material and Method's: A randomized double-blinded trial with doses of 12.5, 25 and 50 mu mol/kg Gd-EOB-DTPA was performed in 35 patients with liver metastases. Liver enhancement, tumor enhancement and liver lesion contrast-to-noise (C/N) ratios were calculated from breath-hold gradient echo images (100/5/80 degrees) recorded precontrast and at different times up to 10 min postcontrast. Results: Normal liver showed a characteristic enhancement pattern, with a rapid enhancement in the first 45 s postcontrast and a slight but significant further increase up to 600 s. The initial enhancement in the lesions was also pronounced, but the enhancement was slightly decreased after 240 s postcontrast. At dose levels of 12.5 and 25 mu mol/kg Gd-EOB-DTPA, C/N ratios significantly increased compared to baseline from 90 to 600 s. Postcontrast C/N-values obtained using 50 mu mol/kg Cd-EOB-DTPA were not significantly increased, except for the examinations 480 s postcontrast. Conclusion: In liver metastases, CIN ratios obtained with doses of 12.5 and 25 mu mol/kg Gd-EOB-DTPA were slightly superior to 50 mu mol/kg Gd-EOB-DTPA. This finding is probably due to a more pronounced extracellular effect of the contrast medium at higher doses.
引用
收藏
页码:255 / 262
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [21] Enhancement characteristics of liver metastases, hepatocellular carcinomas, and hemangiomas with Gd-EOB-DTPA: Preliminary results with dynamic MR imaging
    Reimer, P
    Rummeny, EJ
    Daldrup, HE
    Hesse, T
    Balzer, T
    Tombach, B
    Peters, PE
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 1997, 7 (02) : 275 - 280
  • [22] Phase II clinical evaluation of Gd-EOB-DTPA: Dose, safety aspects, and pulse sequence
    Reimer, P
    Rummeny, EJ
    Shamsi, K
    Balzer, T
    Daldrup, HE
    Tombach, B
    Hesse, T
    Berns, T
    Peters, PE
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1996, 199 (01) : 177 - 183
  • [23] A comparison of two MR hepatobiliary gadolinium chelates: Gd-BOPTA and Gd-EOB-DTPA
    Runge, VM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1998, 22 (04) : 643 - 650
  • [24] Schima W, 1999, JMRI-J MAGN RESON IM, V10, P80, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2586(199907)10:1<80::AID-JMRI11>3.0.CO
  • [25] 2-S
  • [26] PRECLINICAL EVALUATION OF GD-EOB-DTPA AS A CONTRAST AGENT IN MR IMAGING OF THE HEPATOBILIARY SYSTEM
    SCHUHMANNGIAMPIERI, G
    SCHMITTWILLICH, H
    PRESS, WR
    NEGISHI, C
    WEINMANN, HJ
    SPECK, U
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1992, 183 (01) : 59 - 64
  • [27] FOCAL LIVER-DISEASE - COMPARISON OF DYNAMIC CONTRAST-ENHANCED CT AND T2-WEIGHTED FAT-SUPPRESSED, FLASH, AND DYNAMIC GADOLINIUM-ENHANCED MR IMAGING AT 1.5T
    SEMELKA, RC
    SHOENUT, JP
    KROEKER, MA
    GREENBERG, HM
    SIMM, FC
    MINUK, GY
    KROEKER, RM
    MICFLIKIER, AB
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1992, 184 (03) : 687 - 694
  • [28] HEPATIC METASTASES - RANDOMIZED, CONTROLLED COMPARISON OF DETECTION WITH MR IMAGING AND CT
    STARK, DD
    WITTENBERG, J
    BUTCH, RJ
    FERRUCCI, JT
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1987, 165 (02) : 399 - 406
  • [29] HEPATIC MICRO-METASTESES IN THE RAT - FERRITE-ENHANCED MR IMAGING
    TSANG, YM
    STARK, DD
    CHEN, MCM
    WEISSLEDER, R
    WITTENBERG, J
    FERRUCCI, JT
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1988, 167 (01) : 21 - 24
  • [30] Liver tumors: Comparison of MR imaging with Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-DTPA
    Vogl, TJ
    Kummel, S
    Hammerstingl, R
    Schellenbeck, M
    Schumacher, G
    Balzer, T
    Schwarz, W
    Muller, PK
    Bechstein, WO
    Mack, MG
    Sollner, O
    Felix, R
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1996, 200 (01) : 59 - 67