Analysis of control architectures for teleoperation systems with impedance/admittance master and slave manipulators

被引:262
作者
Hashtrudi-Zaad, K [1 ]
Salcudean, SE
机构
[1] Queens Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
[2] Univ British Columbia, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
关键词
absolute stability; bilateral control; two-port network; teleoperation; transparency;
D O I
10.1177/02783640122067471
中图分类号
TP24 [机器人技术];
学科分类号
080202 ; 1405 ;
摘要
A large number of bilateral teleoperation control architectures in the literature have been designed based on assumed impedance models of the master and slave manipulators. However hydraulic or heavily geared and many other manipulators cannot be properly described by impedance models. In this paper, a common four-channel bilateral control architecture designed for the above impedance models is extended to teleoperation systems with master and slave manipulators of either the admittance or impedance type. Furthermore, control parameters that provide perfect transparency under ideal conditions are found for each type of teleoperation system. Because in practice such parameters may not lead to systems that are robust to time delays and model uncertainties, an analysis of the stability and performance robustness of this very general architecture and two-channel architectures is also presented. The analysis uses the passivity-based Llewellyn two-port network absolute stability criterion, as well as bounds on the minimum and range of values of the impedance transmitted to the operator The results of these evaluations provide design guidelines on choosing a particular control architecture and its parameters given different master and slave manipulator structures.
引用
收藏
页码:419 / 445
页数:27
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Stable haptic interaction with virtual environments [J].
Adams, RJ ;
Hannaford, B .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION, 1999, 15 (03) :465-474
[2]   BILATERAL CONTROL OF TELEOPERATORS WITH TIME-DELAY [J].
ANDERSON, RJ ;
SPONG, MW .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 1989, 34 (05) :494-501
[3]  
BROOKS TL, 1990, 1990 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN, AND CYBERNETICS, P113, DOI 10.1109/ICSMC.1990.142071
[4]  
Clover CL, 1997, IEEE INT CONF ROBOT, P724, DOI 10.1109/ROBOT.1997.620121
[5]   ROBUST IMPEDANCE SHAPING TELEMANIPULATION [J].
COLGATE, JE .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION, 1993, 9 (04) :374-384
[6]  
COLGATE JE, 1994, IEEE INT CONF ROBOT, P3205, DOI 10.1109/ROBOT.1994.351077
[7]   ROBUST-CONTROL OF DYNAMICALLY INTERACTING SYSTEMS [J].
COLGATE, JE ;
HOGAN, N .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONTROL, 1988, 48 (01) :65-88
[8]   Fundamental limits of performance for force reflecting teleoperation [J].
Daniel, RW ;
McAree, PR .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROBOTICS RESEARCH, 1998, 17 (08) :811-830
[9]   Force reflecting telemanipulators with time-delay: Stability analysis and control design [J].
Eusebi, A ;
Melchiorri, C .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION, 1998, 14 (04) :635-640
[10]  
Handlykken M., 1980, Proceedings of the 19th IEEE Conference on Decision & Control Including the Symposium on Adaptive Processes, P1197