Controlled clinical comparison of the BacT/ALERT FN and the standard anaerobic SN blood culture medium

被引:15
作者
Mirrett, S
Petti, CA
Woods, CW
Magadia, R
Weinstein, MP
Reller, LB
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Clin Microbiol Lab, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[3] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[4] Robert Wood Johnson Univ Hosp, Microbiol Lab, New Brunswick, NJ USA
[5] Univ Med & Dent New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Med Sch, Dept Med, New Brunswick, NJ 08903 USA
[6] Univ Med & Dent New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Med Sch, Dept Pathol, New Brunswick, NJ 08903 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1128/JCM.42.10.4581-4585.2004
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
To determine the optimal anaerobic companion bottle to pair with the BacT/ALERT (bioMerieux, Durham, N.C.) nonvented aerobic FA (FA) medium for recovery of pathogenic microorganisms from adult patients with bacteremia and fungemia, we compared the BacT/ALERT FN (FN) anaerobic bottle with the standard BacT/ALERT SN (SN) anaerobic bottle. Each bottle, FA, FN, and SN, was filled with 8 to 12 ml of blood. Of 11,498 blood culture sets received in the clinical microbiology laboratories at two university medical centers, 7,945 sets had all three bottles filled adequately and 8,569 had both anaerobic bottles filled adequately. Of 686 clinically important (based on previously published criteria) isolates detected in one or both adequately filled anaerobic bottles, more staphylococci (P < 0.001), including Staphylococcus aureus (P < 0.001); members of the family Enterobacteriaceae (P < 0.001); and all microorganisms combined (P < 0.001) were detected in FN bottles. In contrast, more Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates (P < 0.01) and yeasts (P < 0.001) were detected in SN bottles. More Bacteroides fragilis group bacteremias were detected only in the FN (six) than in the SN (one) anaerobic bottle (P = not significant). Overall, the mean time to detection was shorter with FN (16.8 h) than with SN (18.2 h). This difference in time to detection was greatest for the B. fragilis group: FN, 28 h, versus SN, 60.0 h. Many of the facultative microorganisms recovered in either FN or SN were also found in the companion FA. When microorganisms found in the companion FA bottle were omitted from the analysis, significantly more staphylococci (P < 0.001), including S. aureus (P < 0.001), and Enterobacteriaceae (P < 0.005) still were detected in FN bottles, whereas there were no significant differences for P. aeruginosa and yeasts, which were found as expected in FA bottles. We conclude that the companion anaerobic FN bottle detects more microorganisms than does the anaerobic SN bottle when used in conjunction with the nonvented aerobic FA bottle in the BacT/ALERT blood culture system.
引用
收藏
页码:4581 / 4585
页数:5
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]   Controlled comparative evaluation of BacT/Alert FAN and ESP 80A aerobic media as means for detecting bacteremia and fungemia [J].
Doern, GV ;
Barton, A ;
Rao, S .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1998, 36 (09) :2686-2689
[2]   Clinical importance of increased sensitivity of BacT/Alert FAN aerobic and anaerobic blood culture bottles [J].
McDonald, LC ;
Fune, J ;
Gaido, LB ;
Weinstein, MP ;
Reimer, LG ;
Flynn, TM ;
Wilson, ML ;
Mirrett, S ;
Reller, LB .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1996, 34 (09) :2180-2184
[3]  
MCNEMAR Q, 1962, PSYCHOL STATISTICS, P209
[4]   RATIONALE FOR SELECTIVE USE OF ANAEROBIC BLOOD CULTURES [J].
MORRIS, AJ ;
WILSON, ML ;
MIRRETT, S ;
RELLER, LB .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1993, 31 (08) :2110-2113
[5]  
Murray P.R., 1999, MANUAL CLIN MICROBIO, V7th
[6]  
Weinstein MP, 1997, CLIN INFECT DIS, V24, P584, DOI 10.1093/clind/24.4.584
[7]   CONTROLLED EVALUATION OF BACT ALERT STANDARD AEROBIC AND FAN AEROBIC BLOOD CULTURE BOTTLES FOR DETECTION OF BACTEREMIA AND FUNGEMIA [J].
WEINSTEIN, MP ;
MIRRETT, S ;
REIMER, LG ;
WILSON, ML ;
SMITHELEKES, S ;
CHUARD, CR ;
JOHO, KL ;
RELLER, LB .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1995, 33 (04) :978-981
[8]   CONTROLLED EVALUATION OF BACT ALERT STANDARD ANAEROBIC AND FAN ANAEROBIC BLOOD CULTURE BOTTLES FOR THE DETECTION OF BACTEREMIA AND FUNGEMIA [J].
WILSON, ML ;
WEINSTEIN, MP ;
MIRRETT, S ;
REIMER, LG ;
FELDMAN, RJ ;
CHUARD, CR ;
RELLER, LB .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1995, 33 (09) :2265-2270
[9]   CONTROLLED EVALUATION OF BACTEC PLUS-27 AND ROCHE SEPTI-CHEK ANAEROBIC BLOOD CULTURE BOTTLES [J].
WILSON, ML ;
HARRELL, LJ ;
MIRRETT, S ;
WEINSTEIN, MP ;
STRATTON, CW ;
RELLER, LB .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1992, 30 (01) :63-66
[10]   Controlled clinical comparison of BACTEC Plus Anaerobic/F to Standard Anaerobic/F as the anaerobic companion bottle to Plus Aerobic/F medium for culturing blood from adults [J].
Wilson, ML ;
Mirrett, S ;
Meredith, FT ;
Weinstein, MP ;
Scotto, V ;
Reller, LB .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2001, 39 (03) :983-989