Assessment of mand selection for functional communication training packages

被引：54

作者：

Winborn, L ^{[1
]}

Wacker, DP ^{[1
]}

Richman, DM ^{[1
]}

Asmus, J ^{[1
]}

Geier, D ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA

来源：

JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS | 2002年 / 35卷 / 03期

关键词：

functional analysis; functional communication training; problem behavior; mand selection;

D O I：

10.1901/jaba.2002.35-295

中图分类号：

B849 [应用心理学];

学科分类号：

040203 ;

摘要：

We evaluated the effects of training novel and existing mands during functional communication training (FCT) to decrease problem behavior for 2 children. A functional analysis (Phase 1) identified mands for FCT. Phase 2 used distinct stimulus conditions to train novel and existing mands. Phase 3 evaluated allocation of responding within a concurrent-schedules design. When reinforcement for either mand was concurrently available, the children used existing mands more than novel mands, but higher levels of problem behavior occurred with existing mands.

引用

页码：295 / 298

页数：4

共 5 条

[1] The effects of noncontingent and contingent attention for self-injury, manding, and collateral responses [J].

Derby, KM ;

Fisher, WW ;

Piazza, CC ;

Wilke, AE ;

Johnson, W .

BEHAVIOR MODIFICATION, 1998, 22 (04) :474-484

[2] FUNCTIONAL COMMUNICATION TRAINING TO REDUCE CHALLENGING BEHAVIOR - MAINTENANCE AND APPLICATION IN NEW SETTINGS [J].

DURAND, VM ;

CARR, EG .

JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 1991, 24 (02) :251-264

[3] THE EFFECTS OF RESPONSE EFFICIENCY ON FUNCTIONALLY EQUIVALENT COMPETING BEHAVIORS [J].

HORNER, RH ;

DAY, HM .

JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 1991, 24 (04) :719-732

[4] The effects of competing reinforcement schedules on the acquisition of functional communication [J].

Kelley, ME ;

Lerman, DC ;

Van Camp, CM .

JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 2002, 35 (01) :59-63

[5] Response efficiency during functional communication training: Effects of effort on response allocation [J].

Richman, DM ;

Wacker, DP ;

Winborn, L .

JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 2001, 34 (01) :73-76

← 1 →