Posaconazole vs. fluconazole or itraconazole prophylaxis in patients with neutropenia

被引:1304
作者
Cornely, Oliver A.
Maertens, Johan
Winston, Drew J.
Perfect, John
Ullmann, Andrew J.
Walsh, Thomas J.
Helfgott, David
Holowiecki, Jerzy
Stockelberg, Dick
Goh, Yeow-Tee
Petrini, Mario
Hardalo, Cathy
Suresh, Ramachandran
Angulo-Gonzalez, David
机构
[1] Univ Cologne, Cologne, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp Gasthuisberg, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[3] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA USA
[4] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Durham, NC USA
[5] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, D-6500 Mainz, Germany
[6] NCI, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[7] Weill Cornell Med Coll, New York, NY USA
[8] Silesian Med Univ, Katowice, Poland
[9] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Gothenburg, Sweden
[10] Singapore Gen Hosp, Singapore 0316, Singapore
[11] Univ Pisa, Pisa, Italy
[12] Schering Plough Corp, Res Inst, Kenilworth, NJ 07033 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1056/NEJMoa061094
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Patients with neutropenia resulting from chemotherapy for acute myelogenous leukemia or the myelodysplastic syndrome are at high risk for difficult-to-treat and often fatal invasive fungal infections. METHODS: In this randomized, multicenter study involving evaluators who were unaware of treatment assignments, we compared the efficacy and safety of posaconazole with those of fluconazole or itraconazole as prophylaxis for patients with prolonged neutropenia. Patients received prophylaxis with each cycle of chemotherapy until recovery from neutropenia and complete remission, until occurrence of an invasive fungal infection, or for up to 12 weeks, whichever came first. We compared the incidence of proven or probable invasive fungal infections during treatment (the primary end point) between the posaconazole and fluconazole or itraconazole groups; death from any cause and time to death were secondary end points. RESULTS: A total of 304 patients were randomly assigned to receive posaconazole, and 298 patients were randomly assigned to receive fluconazole (240) or itraconazole (58). Proven or probable invasive fungal infections were reported in 7 patients (2%) in the posaconazole group and 25 patients (8%) in the fluconazole or itraconazole group (absolute reduction in the posaconazole group, -6%; 95% confidence interval, -9.7 to -2.5%; P<0.001), fulfilling statistical criteria for superiority. Significantly fewer patients in the posaconazole group had invasive aspergillosis (2 [1%] vs. 20 [7%], P<0.001). Survival was significantly longer among recipients of posaconazole than among recipients of fluconazole or itraconazole (P=0.04). Serious adverse events possibly or probably related to treatment were reported by 19 patients (6%) in the posaconazole group and 6 patients (2%) in the fluconazole or itraconazole group (P=0.01). The most common treatment-related adverse events in both groups were gastrointestinal tract disturbances. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing chemotherapy for acute myelogenous leukemia or the myelodysplastic syndrome, posaconazole prevented invasive fungal infections more effectively than did either fluconazole or itraconazole and improved overall survival. There were more serious adverse events possibly or probably related to treatment in the posaconazole group.
引用
收藏
页码:348 / 359
页数:12
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [31] Pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy of posaconazole in patients with persistent febrile neutropenia or refractory invasive fungal infection
    Ullmann, AJ
    Cornely, OA
    Burchardt, A
    Hachem, R
    Kontoyiannis, DP
    Töpelt, K
    Courtney, R
    Wexler, D
    Krishna, G
    Martinho, M
    Corcoran, G
    Raad, I
    [J]. ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2006, 50 (02) : 658 - 666
  • [32] Posaconazole is effective as salvage therapy in zygomycosis: A retrospective summary of 91 cases
    van Burik, JAH
    Hare, RS
    Solomon, HF
    Corrado, ML
    Kontoyiannis, DP
    [J]. CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2006, 42 (07) : E61 - E65
  • [33] Fluconazole versus itraconazole for antifungal prophylaxis in neutropenic patients with haematological malignancies: a meta-analysis of randomised-controlled trials (vol 131, pg 22, 2005)
    Vardakas, KZ
    Michalopoulos, A
    Falagas, ME
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 2006, 132 (05) : 665 - 665
  • [34] Fluconazole versus itraconazole for antifungal prophylaxis in neutropenic patients with haematological malignancies:: a meta-analysis of randomised-controlled trials
    Vardakas, KZ
    Michalopoulos, A
    Falagas, ME
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 2005, 131 (01) : 22 - 28
  • [35] Candidemia in cancer patients: A prospective, multicenter surveillance study by the Invasive Fungal Infection Group (IFIG) of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)
    Viscoli, C
    Girmenia, C
    Marinus, A
    Collette, L
    Martino, P
    Vandercam, B
    Doyen, C
    Lebeau, B
    Spence, D
    Krcmery, V
    De Pauw, B
    Meunier, F
    [J]. CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1999, 28 (05) : 1071 - 1079
  • [36] VONBIFF M, 1995, RESPIRATION, V62, P341
  • [37] FLUCONAZOLE PROPHYLAXIS OF FUNGAL-INFECTIONS IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE-LEUKEMIA - RESULTS OF A RANDOMIZED PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, DOUBLE-BLIND, MULTICENTER TRIAL
    WINSTON, DJ
    CHANDRASEKAR, PH
    LAZARUS, HM
    GOODMAN, JL
    SILBER, JL
    HOROWITZ, H
    SHADDUCK, RK
    ROSENFELD, CS
    HO, WG
    ISLAM, MZ
    BUELL, DN
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1993, 118 (07) : 495 - 503
  • [38] Intravenous and oral itraconazole versus intravenous and oral fluconazole for long-term antifungal prophylaxis in allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplant recipients - A multicenter, randomized trial
    Winston, DJ
    Maziarz, RT
    Chandrasekar, PH
    Lazarus, HM
    Goldman, M
    Blumer, JL
    Leitz, GJ
    Territo, MC
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2003, 138 (09) : 705 - 713