Randomized Trial and Pharmacokinetic Study of Pegfilgrastim versus Filgrastim after Dose-Intensive Chemotherapy in Young Adults and Children with Sarcomas

被引:36
作者
Fox, Elizabeth [1 ]
Widemann, Brigitte C.
Hawkins, Douglas S. [3 ]
Jayaprakash, Nalini
Dagher, Ramzi
Aikin, Alberta A.
Bernstein, Donna
Long, Lauren
Mackall, Crystal
Helman, Lee
Steinberg, Seth M. [2 ]
Balis, Frank M.
机构
[1] NCI, Pharmacol & Expt Therapeut Sect, Pediat Oncol Branch, CCR, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[2] NCI, Biostat & Data Management Sect, Ctr Canc Res, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[3] Seattle Childrens Hosp, Seattle, WA USA
关键词
SINGLE-ADMINISTRATION PEGFILGRASTIM; FEBRILE NEUTROPENIA; DOUBLE-BLIND; CANCER; MULTICENTER; CYCLE; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-0761
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 [肿瘤学];
摘要
Purpose: To compare the effectiveness, tolerance, and pharmacokinetics of a single dose of pegfilgrastim to daily filgrastim in children and young adults with sarcomas treated with dose-intensive combination chemotherapy. Experimental Design: Patients were randomized to receive a single dose of 100 mcg/kg of pegfilgrastim s.c. or 5 mcg/kg/day of filgrastim s.c., daily until neutrophil recovery after two treatment cycles with vincristine, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (VDC) and two cycles of etoposide and ifosfamide (IE). The duration of severe neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count, :<= 500/mcL) during cycles 1 to 4 and cycle duration for all cycles were compared. Pharmacokinetics of pegfilgrastim and filgrastim and CD34+ stem cell mobilization were studied on cycle 1. Growth factor-related toxicity, transfusions, and episodes of fever and neutropenia and infections were collected for cycles 1 to 4. Results: Thirty-four patients (median age, 20 years; range 3.8-25.8) were enrolled, and 32 completed cycles 1 to 4. The median (range) duration of absolute neutrophil count of <500/mcL was 5.5 (3-8) days for pegfilgrastim and 6 (0-9) days for filgrastim (P = 0.76) after VDC, and 1.5 (0-4) days for pegfilgrastim and 3.75 (0-6.5) days for filgrastim (P = 0.11) after IE. More episodes of febrile neutropenia and documented infections occurred on the filgrastim arm. Serum pegfilgrastim concentrations were highly variable. Pegfilgrastim apparent clearance (11 mL/h/kg) was similar to that reported in adults. Conclusion: A single dose per cycle of pegfilgrastim was well tolerated and may be as effective as daily filgrastim based on the duration of severe neutropenia and number of episodes of febrile neutropenia and documented infections after dose-intensive treatment with VDC and IE. (Clin Cancer Res 2009;15(23):7361-7)
引用
收藏
页码:7361 / 7367
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]
Safety and efficacy of pegfilgrastim in children with cancer receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy [J].
Andre, Nicolas ;
El Kababri, Maria ;
Bertrand, Pourroy ;
Rome, Angelique ;
Coze, Carole ;
Gentet, Jean Claude ;
Bernard, Jean Louis .
ANTI-CANCER DRUGS, 2007, 18 (03) :277-281
[2]
Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors in the management of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia: evidence based review [J].
Bhana, Nila .
CURRENT OPINION IN ONCOLOGY, 2007, 19 (04) :328-335
[3]
A single dose of 6 or 12 mg of pegfilgrastim for peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization results in similar yields of CD34+ progenitors in patients with multiple myeloma [J].
Bruns, I ;
Steidl, U ;
Kronenwett, R ;
Fenk, R ;
Graef, T ;
Rohr, UP ;
Neumann, F ;
Fischer, J ;
Scheid, C ;
Hübel, K ;
Haas, R ;
Kobbe, G .
TRANSFUSION, 2006, 46 (02) :180-185
[4]
Crawford Jeffrey, 2002, Curr Hematol Rep, V1, P95
[5]
A randomized double-blind multicenter phase III study of fixed-dose single-administration pegfilgrastim versus daily filgrastim in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy [J].
Green, MD ;
Koelbl, H ;
Baselga, J ;
Galid, A ;
Guillem, V ;
Gascon, P ;
Siena, S ;
Lalisang, RI ;
Samonigg, H ;
Clemens, MR ;
Zani, V ;
Liang, BC ;
Renwick, J ;
Piccart, MJ .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2003, 14 (01) :29-35
[6]
Blinded, randomized, multicenter study to evaluate single administration pegfilgrastim once per cycle versus daily filgrastim as an adjunct to chemotherapy in patients with high-risk stage II or stage III/IV breast cancer [J].
Holmes, FA ;
O'Shaughnessy, JA ;
Vukelja, S ;
Jones, SE ;
Shogan, J ;
Savin, M ;
Glaspy, J ;
Moore, M ;
Meza, L ;
Wiznitzer, I ;
Neumann, TA ;
Hill, LR ;
Liang, BC .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 20 (03) :727-731
[7]
Randomized, dose-escalation study of SD/01 compared with daily filgrastim in patients receiving chemotherapy [J].
Johnston, E ;
Crawford, J ;
Blackwell, S ;
Bjurstrom, T ;
Lockbaum, P ;
Roskos, L ;
Yang, BB ;
Gardner, S ;
Miller-Messana, MA ;
Shoemaker, D ;
Garst, J ;
Schwab, G .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 18 (13) :2522-2528
[8]
Koontz SE, 2004, J CLIN ONCOL, V22, p796S
[9]
The design and development of pegfilgrastim (PEG-rmetHuG-CSF, neulasta®) [J].
Molineux, G .
CURRENT PHARMACEUTICAL DESIGN, 2004, 10 (11) :1235-1244
[10]
Growth factor practice patterns among pediatric oncologists: Results of a 1998 Pediatric Oncology Group survey [J].
Parsons, SK ;
Mayer, DK ;
Alexander, SW ;
Xu, RH ;
Land, V ;
Laver, J .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC HEMATOLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2000, 22 (03) :227-241