Comparative genotyping of Campylobacter jejuni by amplified fragment length polymorphism, multilocus sequence typing, and short repeat sequencing:: Strain diversity, host range, and recombination

被引:181
作者
Schouls, LM
Reulen, S
Duim, B
Wagenaar, JA
Willems, RJL
Dingle, KE
Colles, FM
Van Embden, JDA
机构
[1] Natl Inst Publ Hlth & Environm, Res Lab Infect Dis, NL-3720 BA Bilthoven, Netherlands
[2] Inst Anim Sci & Hlth, Div Infect Dis & Food Chain Qual, Lelystad, Netherlands
[3] Univ Oxford, Peter Medawar Bldg Pathogen Res, Oxford OX1 3FY, England
[4] Univ Oxford, Dept Zool, Oxford OX1 3FY, England
关键词
D O I
10.1128/JCM.41.1.15-26.2003
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Three molecular typing methods were used to study the relationships among 184 Campylobacter strains isolated from humans, cattle, and chickens. All strains were genotyped by amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) analysis, multilocus sequence typing (MLST), and sequence analysis of a genomic region with short tandem repeats designated clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPRs). MLST and AFLP analysis yielded more than 100 different profiles and patterns, respectively. These multiple-locus typing methods resulted in similar genetic clustering, indicating that both are useful in disclosing genetic relationships between Campylobacter jejuni isolates. Group separation analysis of the AFLP analysis and MLST data revealed an unexpected association between cattle and human strains, suggesting a common source of infection. Analysis of the polymorphic CRISPR region carrying short repeats allowed about two-thirds of the typeable strains to be distinguished, similar to AFLP analysis and MLST. The three methods proved to be equally powerful in identifying strains from outbreaks of human campylobacteriosis. Analysis of the MLST data showed that intra- and interspecies recombination occurs frequently and that the role of recombination in sequence variation is 50 times greater than that of mutation. Examination of strains cultured from cecum swabs revealed that individual chickens harbored multiple Campylobacter strain types and that some genotypes were found in more than one chicken. We conclude that typing of Campylobacter strains is useful for identification of outbreaks but is probably not useful for source tracing and global epidemiology because of carriage of strains of multiple types and an extremely high diversity of strains in animals.
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 26
页数:12
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Epidemiologic and clinical features of Campylobacter jejuni infections [J].
Blaser, MJ .
JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1997, 176 :S103-S105
[2]  
*CENTR PUBL HLTH L, 2001, COMMUN DIS REP WKLY, V11, P7
[3]   Sensor, a population-based cohort study on gastroenteritis in the Netherlands:: Incidence and etiology [J].
de Wit, MAS ;
Koopmans, MPG ;
Kortbeek, LM ;
Wannet, WJB ;
Vinjé, J ;
van Leusden, F ;
Bartelds, AIM ;
van Duynhoven, YTHF .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2001, 154 (07) :666-674
[4]   Gastroenteritis in sentinel general practices, the Netherlands [J].
de Wit, MAS ;
Koopmans, MPG ;
Kortbeek, LM ;
van Leeuwen, NJ ;
Bartelds, AIM ;
van Duynhoven, YTHP .
EMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2001, 7 (01) :82-91
[5]   Genome sequence-based fluorescent amplified fragment length polymorphism of Campylobacter jejuni, its relationship to serotyping, and its implications for epidemiological analysis [J].
Desai, M ;
Logan, JMJ ;
Frost, JA ;
Stanley, J .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2001, 39 (11) :3823-3829
[6]   Multilocus sequence typing system for Campylobacter jejuni [J].
Dingle, KE ;
Colles, FM ;
Wareing, DRA ;
Ure, R ;
Fox, AJ ;
Bolton, FE ;
Bootsma, HJ ;
Willems, RJL ;
Urwin, R ;
Maiden, MCJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2001, 39 (01) :14-23
[7]   Amplified fragment length polymorphism analysis of Campylobacter jejuni strains isolated from chickens and from patients with gastroenteritis or Guillain-Barre or Miller Fisher syndrome [J].
Duim, B ;
Ang, CW ;
van Belkum, A ;
Rigter, A ;
van Leeuwen, NWJ ;
Endtz, HP ;
Wagenaar, JA .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2000, 66 (09) :3917-3923
[8]  
Duim B, 1999, APPL ENVIRON MICROB, V65, P2369
[9]  
*DUTCH INSP HLTH P, 2001, ZOON ZOON AG HUM FOO
[10]  
Endtz HP, 2000, J CLIN MICROBIOL, V38, P2297