Effects of extraction temperature and preservation method on functionality of soy protein

被引:38
作者
Deak, Nicolas A. [1 ]
Johnson, Lawrence A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Iowa State Univ, Dept Food Sci & Human Nutr, Ctr Crops Utilizat Res, Ames, IA 50011 USA
关键词
soy protein isolate; soybeans; freeze-drying; protein; spray-drying; solubility; surface hydrophobicity; emulsification; foaming; dynamic viscosity; functionality;
D O I
10.1007/s11746-007-1035-7
中图分类号
O69 [应用化学];
学科分类号
081704 ;
摘要
The effects of extraction temperature and preservation method on the functional properties of soy protein isolate (SPI) were determined. Four extraction temperatures (25, 40, 60, and 80 degrees C) were used to produce SPI and yields of solids and protein contents were determined. Three preservation methods were also tested (spray-drying, freeze-drying, and freezing-thawing) and compared to fresh (undried) samples for each extraction temperature. No differences in yields of solids and protein were observed among SPIs extracted at 25, 40, and 60 degrees C; however, SPI extracted at 80 degrees C yielded significantly less solids and protein. Extraction temperature significantly affected SPI functionality. As extraction temperature increased, solubility and emulsification capacity decreased; surface hydrophobicities, emulsification activities and stabilities, and dynamic viscosities increased; and foaming properties improved. Preservation method also significantly affected SPI functionality. Drying method did not affect the denaturation enthalpies of SPIs, but spray-dried SPIs had higher solubilities, surface hydrophobicities, and emulsification stabilities, and lower viscosities, emulsification activities and rates of foaming than freeze-dried SPI exhibited. Emulsification and foaming capacities and foaming stabilities were similar for both methods of drying. There was significant interaction between extraction temperature and preservation method for all functional properties except emulsification capacity.
引用
收藏
页码:259 / 268
页数:10
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
AOAC, 1995, OFF METH AN ASS OFF
[2]   Functional properties of soy protein fractions produced using a pilot plant-scale process [J].
Bian, YL ;
Myers, DJ ;
Dias, K ;
Lihono, MA ;
Wu, SW ;
Murphy, PA .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN OIL CHEMISTS SOCIETY, 2003, 80 (06) :545-549
[3]   SPRAY-DRIED SOY PROTEIN ISOLATE SOLUBILITY, GELLING CHARACTERISTICS, AND EXTRACTABLE PROTEIN AS AFFECTED BY ANTIOXIDANTS [J].
BOATRIGHT, WL ;
HETTIARACHCHY, NS .
JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE, 1995, 60 (04) :806-809
[4]   EFFECT OF CONGLYCININ ON THE THERMAL AGGREGATION OF GLYCININ [J].
DAMODARAN, S ;
KINSELLA, JE .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 1982, 30 (05) :812-817
[5]  
Damodaran S., 1989, Food Proteins, P21
[6]  
FAGAIN CO, 1997, STABILIZING PROTEIN, P163
[7]  
FRANKS F, 1991, ADV EXP MED BIOL, P1
[8]   THERMAL-DISSOCIATION AND ASSOCIATION BEHAVIOR OF SOY PROTEINS [J].
GERMAN, B ;
DAMODARAN, S ;
KINSELLA, JE .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 1982, 30 (05) :807-811
[9]  
GOLBITZ P, 2003, WHOLE SOYBEANS FOOD
[10]   Comparison of Kjeldahl and Dumas methods for determining protein contents of soybean products [J].
Jung, S ;
Rickert, DA ;
Deak, NA ;
Aldin, ED ;
Recknor, J ;
Johnson, LA ;
Murphy, PA .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN OIL CHEMISTS SOCIETY, 2003, 80 (12) :1169-1173