A tale of two proteins:: Differential roles and regulation of Smad2 and Smad3 in TGF-β signaling

被引:330
作者
Brown, Kimberly A.
Pietenpol, Jennifer A.
Moses, Harold L.
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Vanderbilt Ingram Canc Ctr, Dept Canc Biol, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
[2] Vanderbilt Univ, Vanderbilt Ingram Canc Ctr, Dept Biochem, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
关键词
TGF-beta; Smad2; Smad3; transcription factors; localization; cancer; therapeutics;
D O I
10.1002/jcb.21255
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) is an important growth inhibitor of epithelial cells, and insensitivity to this cytokine results in uncontrolled cell proliferation and can contribute to tumorigenesis. Smad2 and Smad3 are direct mediators of TGF-beta signaling, however little is known about the selective activation of Smad2 versus Smad3. The Smad2 and Smad3 knockout mouse phenotypes and studies comparing Smad2 and Smad3 activation of TGF-beta target genes, suggest that Smad2 and Smad3 have distinct roles in TGF-beta signaling. The observation that TGF-beta inhibits proliferation of Smad3-null mammary gland epithelial cells, whereas Smad3 deficient fibroblasts are only partially growth inhibited, suggests that Smad3 has a different role in epithelial cells and fibroblasts. Herein, the current understanding of Smad2 and Smad3-mediated TGF-beta signaling and their relative roles are discussed, in addition to potential mechanisms for the selective activation of Smad2 versus Smad3. Since alterations in the TGF-beta signaling pathway play an important role in promoting tumorigenesis and cancer progression, methods for therapeutic targeting of the TGF-beta signaling pathway are being pursued. Determining how Smad2 or Smad3 differentially regulate the TGF-beta response may translate into developing more effective strategies for cancer therapy.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 33
页数:25
相关论文
共 212 条
[31]   Role of transforming growth factor-β signaling in cancer [J].
de Caestecker, MP ;
Piek, E ;
Roberts, AB .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2000, 92 (17) :1388-1402
[32]   The Smad4 activation domain (SAD) is a proline-rich, p300-dependent transcriptional activation domain [J].
de Caestecker, MP ;
Yahata, T ;
Wang, D ;
Parks, WT ;
Huang, SX ;
Hill, CS ;
Shioda, T ;
Roberts, AB ;
Lechleider, RJ .
JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 2000, 275 (03) :2115-2122
[33]   Direct binding of Smad3 and Smad4 to critical TGFβ-inducible elements in the promoter of human plasminogen activator inhibitor-type 1 gene [J].
Dennler, S ;
Itoh, S ;
Vivien, D ;
ten Dijke, P ;
Huet, S ;
Gauthier, JM .
EMBO JOURNAL, 1998, 17 (11) :3091-3100
[34]  
Dennler S, 2002, J LEUKOCYTE BIOL, V71, P731
[35]   A short amino-acid sequence in MH1 domain is responsible for functional differences between Smad2 and Smad3 [J].
Dennler, S ;
Huet, S ;
Gauthier, JM .
ONCOGENE, 1999, 18 (08) :1643-1648
[36]   Inhibition of E-selectin gene expression by transforming growth factor β in endothelial cells involves coactivator integration of Smad and nuclear factor κB-mediated signals [J].
DiChiara, MR ;
Kiely, JM ;
Gimbrone, MA ;
Lee, ME ;
Perrella, MA ;
Topper, JN .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2000, 192 (05) :695-704
[37]   TGFß1/Smad3 counteracts BRCA1-dependent repair of DNA damage [J].
Dubrovska, A ;
Kanamoto, T ;
Lomnytska, M ;
Heldin, CH ;
Volodko, N ;
Souchelnytskyi, S .
ONCOGENE, 2005, 24 (14) :2289-2297
[38]   Interaction of Smads with collagen types I, III, and V [J].
Ellis, LR ;
Warner, DR ;
Greene, RM ;
Pisano, MM .
BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2003, 310 (04) :1117-1123
[39]   TLP, a novel modulator of TGF-β signaling, has opposite effects on Smad2- and Smad3-dependent signaling [J].
Felici, A ;
Wurthner, JU ;
Parks, WT ;
Giam, LR ;
Reiss, M ;
Karpova, TS ;
McNally, JG ;
Roberts, AB .
EMBO JOURNAL, 2003, 22 (17) :4465-4477
[40]  
FENG CG, 2002, J SAFETY ENV, V2, P3