Visual motion sensitivity in dyslexia: evidence for temporal and energy integration deficits

被引:152
作者
Talcott, JB [1 ]
Hansen, PC [1 ]
Assoku, EL [1 ]
Stein, JF [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Physiol Lab, Oxford OX1 3PT, England
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
coherent motion; visual; temporal processing; reading; magnocellular; dyslexia;
D O I
10.1016/S0028-3932(00)00020-8
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
In addition to poor literacy skills, developmental dyslexia has been associated with multisensory deficits for dynamic stimulus detection. In vision these deficits have been suggested to result from impaired sensitivity of cells within the retino-cortical magnocellular pathway and extrastriate areas in the dorsal stream to which they project. One consequence of such selectively reduced sensitivity is a difficulty in extracting motion coherence from dynamic noise, a deficit associated with both developmental dyslexia and persons with extrastriate, dorsal stream lesions. However the precise nature of the mechanism(s) underlying these perceptual deficits in dyslexia remain unknown. In this study, we obtained motion detection thresholds for 10 dyslexic and 10 control adults while varying the spatial and temporal parameters of the random dot kinematogram (RDK) stimuli. In Experiment 1 stimulus duration was manipulated to test whether dyslexics are specifically impaired for detecting short duration. rather than longer stimuli. Dot density was varied in Experiment 2 to examine whether dyslexics' reduced motion sensitivity was affected by the amount of motion energy present in the RDKs. Dyslexics were consistently less sensitive to coherent motion than controls in both experiments. Increasing stimulus duration did not improve dyslexics' performance, whereas increasing dot density did. Thus increasing motion energy assisted the dyslexics, suggesting that their motion detectors have a lower signal to noise ratio, perhaps due to spatial undersampling. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:935 / 943
页数:9
相关论文
共 67 条
[31]   A THEORETICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL CASE FOR A VISUAL DEFICIT IN SPECIFIC READING-DISABILITY [J].
LOVEGROVE, W ;
MARTIN, F ;
SLAGHUIS, W .
COGNITIVE NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 3 (02) :225-267
[32]  
LOVEGROVE W, 1993, STUD VIS INFORM PROC, V3, P33
[33]  
Lovegrove W.J., 1993, VISUAL PROCESSES REA, P311
[34]   THE EFFECTS OF FIELD SIZE AND LUMINANCE ON CONTRAST SENSITIVITY DIFFERENCES BETWEEN SPECIFICALLY READING DISABLED AND NORMAL-CHILDREN [J].
MARTIN, F ;
LOVEGROVE, W .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 1984, 22 (01) :73-77
[35]   FLICKER CONTRAST SENSITIVITY IN NORMAL AND SPECIFICALLY DISABLED READERS [J].
MARTIN, F ;
LOVEGROVE, W .
PERCEPTION, 1987, 16 (02) :215-221
[36]  
MASON A, 1993, CLIN VISION SCI, V8, P345
[37]   FUNCTIONAL-PROPERTIES OF NEURONS IN MIDDLE TEMPORAL VISUAL AREA OF THE MACAQUE MONKEY .1. SELECTIVITY FOR STIMULUS DIRECTION, SPEED, AND ORIENTATION [J].
MAUNSELL, JHR ;
VANESSEN, DC .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1983, 49 (05) :1127-1147
[38]  
MERIGAN WH, 1991, J NEUROSCI, V11, P3422
[39]   HOW PARALLEL ARE THE PRIMATE VISUAL PATHWAYS [J].
MERIGAN, WH ;
MAUNSELL, JHR .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF NEUROSCIENCE, 1993, 16 :369-402
[40]  
Milner AD, 1995, VISUAL BRAIN ACTION