Pregnancy rates after embryo transfer depend on the provider at embryo transfer

被引:114
作者
Hearns-Stokes, RM
Miller, BT
Scott, L
Creuss, D
Chakraborty, PK
Segars, JH
机构
[1] NICHHD, Pediat & Reprod Endocrine Branch, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[2] Walter Reed Army Med Ctr, Assisted Reprod Technol Program, Washington, DC 20307 USA
[3] Uniformed Serv Univ Hlth Sci, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Bethesda, MD 20814 USA
关键词
embryo transfer; technique; IVF-ET; pregnancy rate; physician;
D O I
10.1016/S0015-0282(00)00582-3
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the effect of individual providers on pregnancy outcome after embryo transfer. Design: Retrospective data analysis. Setting: University-based tertiary-care assisted reproductive technology program with 10 physician-providers. Patient(s): Six hundred and seventeen women who underwent 854 fresh embryo transfers between January 1996 and January 1999. Intervention(s): Pregnancies after embryo transfer were recorded for each provider. Main Outcome Measure(s): Establishment of a clinical pregnancy. Result(s): Three hundred ninety-three clinical pregnancies resulted from 854 embryo transfers, for an overall clinical pregnancy rate of 46.0% per embryo transfer. Three hundred forty-seven (40.6%) pregnancies were ongoing. The clinical pregnancy rate varied Significantly between providers: for example, 17.0% (47 transfers) vs. 54.3% (57 transfers) (P<.05). Similarly, the ratio of high-grade embryos required to produce a gestational sac differed between providers. The number or quality of embryos transferred did not differ significantly. Conclusion(s): Significant differences were observed in pregnancy rates after embryo transfer done by different providers, suggesting that embryo transfer technique may influence pregnancy outcome in assisted reproductive technology. (Fertil Steril(R) 2000;74:80-6. (C) 2000 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine).
引用
收藏
页码:80 / 86
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
[11]  
HURLEY VA, 1991, FERTIL STERIL, V55, P559
[12]   Impact of the "physician factor" on pregnancy rates in a large assisted reproductive technology program: do too many cooks spoil the broth? [J].
Karande, VC ;
Morris, R ;
Chapman, C ;
Rinehart, J ;
Gleicher, N .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 1999, 71 (06) :1001-1009
[13]  
KNUTZEN V, 1992, FERTIL STERIL, V57, P156
[14]   What factors are important for successful embryo transfer after in-vitro fertilization? [J].
Kovacs, GT .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1999, 14 (03) :590-592
[15]   The effect of a difficult embryo transfer on the outcome of IVF [J].
Lass, A ;
Abusheikha, N ;
Brinsden, P .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1999, 14 (09) :2417-2417
[16]  
LEETON J, 1982, FERTIL STERIL, V38, P156
[17]   Microdose follicular phase gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRH-a) compared with luteal phase GnRH-a for ovarian stimulation at in vitro fertilization [J].
Leondires, MP ;
Escalpes, M ;
Segars, JH ;
Scott, RT ;
Miller, BT .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 1999, 72 (06) :1018-1023
[18]   The role of uterine straightening by passive bladder distension before embryo transfer in IVF cycles [J].
Lewin, A ;
Schenker, JG ;
Avrech, O ;
Shapira, S ;
Safran, A ;
Friedler, S .
JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 1997, 14 (01) :32-34
[19]  
MANSOUR R, 1990, FERTIL STERIL, V54, P678
[20]  
Nabi A, 1997, HUM REPROD, V12, P1188