Education and its discontents: Overqualification in America, 1972-2002

被引:89
作者
Vaisey, Stephen [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Dept Sociol, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1353/sof.2007.0028
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
The study of education-occupation mismatch, once central to the sociological investigation of the labor market, has been largely abandoned. While labor economists and scholars in other nations continue to investigate overqualification, it has been more than two decades since its last sociological assessment in the United States. Drawing on previous work and guided by Bourdieu's concept of habitus, I hypothesize that workers who have more educational attainments than needed for their jobs will be less satisfied with their jobs, be more politically liberal, and be less likely to endorse an effort-based achievement ideology. Using the 1972-2002 General Social Survey, I find that overqualification has increased substantially, that the expected effects are generally found, and that these effects remain relatively stable over time. I discuss the implications of these findings for understanding the persistence of existing stratification hierarchies.
引用
收藏
页码:835 / 864
页数:30
相关论文
共 52 条
[11]  
BOWLES S, 1976, SCHOOLING CAPITALIST
[12]  
Brown David K., 2001, SOCIOL EDUC, V74, P19
[13]   Overqualification in employment [J].
Brynin, M .
WORK EMPLOYMENT AND SOCIETY, 2002, 16 (04) :637-654
[14]  
BURNS V, 2005, WORK OCCUPATION, V32, P319
[15]   THE SOCIAL AND POLITICAL CONSEQUENCES OF OVEREDUCATION [J].
BURRIS, V .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1983, 48 (04) :454-467
[16]  
*CARN COMM HIGH ED, 1973, COLL GRAD JOBS
[17]  
CHAUVEL L, 2002, JUL M INT SOCI ASS B
[18]   MISMATCH BETWEEN OCCUPATION AND SCHOOLING - A PREVALENCE MEASURE, RECENT TRENDS AND DEMOGRAPHIC-ANALYSIS [J].
CLOGG, CC ;
SHOCKEY, JW .
DEMOGRAPHY, 1984, 21 (02) :235-257
[19]  
COHN E, 1995, LABOUR EC, V0002
[20]   FUNCTIONAL AND CONFLICT THEORIES OF EDUCATIONAL STRATIFICATION [J].
COLLINS, R .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1971, 36 (06) :1002-&