Combination Strategies in Multi-Atlas Image Segmentation: Application to Brain MR Data

被引:389
作者
Artaechevarria, Xabier [1 ]
Munoz-Barrutia, Arrate [1 ]
Ortiz-de-Solorzano, Carlos [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Navarra, Canc Imaging Lab, Ctr Appl Med Res, Pamplona 31008, Spain
关键词
Atlas-based segmentation; classifier combination; combination of segmentations; majority voting; weighted voting; PROBABILISTIC ATLAS; REGISTRATION; VALIDATION; SELECTION;
D O I
10.1109/TMI.2009.2014372
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
It has been shown that employing multiple atlas images improves segmentation accuracy in atlas-based medical image segmentation. Each atlas image is registered to the target image independently and the calculated transformation is applied to the segmentation of the atlas image to obtain a segmented version of the target image. Several independent candidate segmentations result from the process, which must be somehow combined into a single final segmentation. Majority voting is the generally used rule to fuse the segmentations, but more sophisticated methods have also been proposed. In this paper, we show that the use of global weights to ponderate candidate segmentations has a major limitation. As a means to improve segmentation accuracy, we propose the generalized local weighting voting method. Namely, the fusion weights adapt voxel-by-voxel according to a local estimation of segmentation performance. Using digital phantoms and MR images of the human brain, we demonstrate that the performance of each combination technique depends on the gray level contrast characteristics of the segmented region, and that no fusion method yields better results than the others for all the regions. In particular, we show that local combination strategies outperform global methods in segmenting high-contrast structures, while global techniques are less sensitive to noise when contrast between neighboring structures is low. We conclude that, in order to achieve the highest overall segmentation accuracy, the best combination method for each particular structure must be selected.
引用
收藏
页码:1266 / 1277
页数:12
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2004, COMBINING PATTERN CL, DOI DOI 10.1002/0471660264
[2]  
[Anonymous], INTERNET BRAIN SEGME
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1993, Optical Eng
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2001, LNCS, DOI DOI 10.1007/3-540-45468-3_62
[5]  
ARTAECHEVARRIA X, 2008, SPIE MED IMAG IMAGE, V6914
[6]   Zen and the art of medical image registration: correspondence, homology, and quality [J].
Crum, WR ;
Griffin, LD ;
Hill, DLG ;
Hawkes, DJ .
NEUROIMAGE, 2003, 20 (03) :1425-1437
[7]   Automatic 3-D segmentation of internal structures of the head in MR images using a combination of similarity and free-form transformations: Part I, methodology and validation on normal subjects [J].
Dawant, BM ;
Hartmann, SL ;
Thirion, JP ;
Maes, F ;
Vandermeulen, D ;
Demaerel, P .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 1999, 18 (10) :909-916
[8]  
GREGG RC, 1997, IEEE NUCL SCI S, V2, P1117
[9]   Automatic anatomical brain MRI segmentation combining label propagation and decision fusion [J].
Heckemann, Rolf A. ;
Hajnal, Joseph V. ;
Aljabar, Paul ;
Rueckert, Daniel ;
Hammers, Alexander .
NEUROIMAGE, 2006, 33 (01) :115-126
[10]   A 'No Panacea Theorem' for classifier combination [J].
Hu, Roland ;
Damper, R. I. .
PATTERN RECOGNITION, 2008, 41 (08) :2665-2673