One size does not fit all: Understanding user preferences for building automation systems

被引:42
作者
Ahmadi-Karvigh, Simin [1 ]
Ghahramani, Ali [1 ]
Becerik-Gerber, Burcin [2 ]
Soibelman, Lucio [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Calif, Sonny Astani Dept Civil & Environm Engn, KAP 217,3620 South Vermont Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
[2] Univ Southern Calif, Sonny Astani Dept Civil & Environm Engn, KAP 224C,3620 South Vermont Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
[3] Univ Southern Calif, Sonny Astani Dept Civil & Environm Engn, KAP 210A,3620 South Vermont Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Automation; Occupant preferences; Energy efficiency; Adjustable autonomy; Adaptive autonomy; Appliance control; Lighting control; FEEDBACK; TRUST; MODEL; SATISFACTION; PERSONALITY; CONSUMPTION; DESIGN; OFFICE; INCOME; BLINDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.04.015
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
In recent years, technological advances have substantially extended the capabilities of automation systems in buildings. Despite the achieved advances, automation systems have not been widely adopted by building occupants. This paper presents our investigations on automation preferences of occupants for the control of lighting systems and appliances in residential buildings. A survey was carried out to determine how preferences for level of automation vary by contexts as well as individuals' personalities and demographic characteristics. The contexts investigated in this study include rescheduling an energy consuming activity, activity-based appliance state control, and lighting control. The collected data from 250 respondents were analyzed using Generalized Linear Mixed Models. Our findings demonstrate that in all context no automation is the least preferred option. For rescheduling an energy consuming activity, an automation level with higher user participation is more preferred. For activity-based appliance state control and lighting control, levels of automation with lower user participation are more preferred. Our findings also indicate that income and education levels and also personality traits of agreeableness, neuroticism and openness to experience affect the preference of particular automation levels over the others. Findings from this study can be used in designing user-centered automation systems that lead to potentially more satisfying operation and hence, could enhance automation acceptability. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:163 / 173
页数:11
相关论文
共 59 条
[41]   The effect of utility time-varying pricing and load control strategies on residential summer peak electricity use: A review [J].
Newsham, Guy R. ;
Bowker, Brent G. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2010, 38 (07) :3289-3296
[42]   A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation [J].
Parasuraman, R ;
Sheridan, TB ;
Wickens, CD .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART A-SYSTEMS AND HUMANS, 2000, 30 (03) :286-297
[43]  
Parasuraman R, 1999, AUTOMATION TECHNOLOGY AND HUMAN PERFORMANCE: CURRENT RESEARCH AND TRENDS, P119
[44]  
Parasuraman R., 2001, Adaptive control of mental workload
[45]   Brain Machine Interface System Automation Considering User Preferences and Error Perception Feedback [J].
Penaloza, Christian I. ;
Mae, Yasushi ;
Cuellar, Francisco F. ;
Kojima, Masaru ;
Arai, Tatsuo .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATION SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2014, 11 (04) :1275-1281
[46]  
Rocker Carsten, 2005, P 2005 JOINT C SMART, P111
[47]   INTERPERSONAL-TRUST, TRUSTWORTHINESS, AND GULLIBILITY [J].
ROTTER, JB .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1980, 35 (01) :1-7
[48]  
Sauro J, 2012, QUANTIFYING THE USER EXPERIENCE: PRACTICAL STATISTICS FOR USER RESEARCH, P1
[49]   Towards adjustable autonomy for the real world [J].
Scerri, P ;
Pynadath, DV ;
Tambe, M .
JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE RESEARCH, 2002, 17 :171-228
[50]  
Seltman H.J., 2012, Experimental design and analysis