Raingage network design using NEXRAD precipitation estimates

被引:33
作者
Bradley, AA [1 ]
Peters-Lidard, C
Nelson, BR
Smith, JA
Young, CB
机构
[1] Univ Iowa, Iowa Inst Hydraul Res, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[2] Univ Iowa, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[3] NASA, Goddard Space Flight Ctr, Hydrol Sci Branch, Greenbelt, MD 20771 USA
[4] Princeton Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
[5] Univ Kansas, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION | 2002年 / 38卷 / 05期
关键词
network design; hydrologic sampling; precipitation measurement; NEXRAD; Catskill Mountains;
D O I
10.1111/j.1752-1688.2002.tb04354.x
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A general framework is proposed for using precipitation estimates from NEXRAD weather radars in raingage network design. NEXRAD precipitation products are used to represent space time rainfall fields, which can be sampled by hypothetical raingage networks. A stochastic model is used to simulate gage observations based on the areal average precipitation for radar grid cells. The stochastic model accounts for subgrid variability of precipitation within the cell and gage measurement errors. The approach is ideally suited to raingage network design in regions with strong climatic variations in rainfall where conventional methods are sometimes lacking. A case study example involving the estimation of areal average precipitation for catchments in the Catskill Mountains illustrates the approach. The case study shows how the simulation approach can be used to quantify the effects of gage density, basin size, spatial variation of precipitation, and gage measurement error, on network estimates of areal average precipitation. Although the quality of NEXRAD precipitation products imposes limitations on their use in network design, weather radars can provide valuable information for empirical assessment of raingage network estimation errors. Still, the biggest challenge in quantifying estimation errors is understanding subgrid spatial variability. The results from the case study show that the spatial correlation of precipitation at subgrid scales (4 km and less) is difficult to quantify, especially for short sampling durations. Network estimation errors for hourly precipitation are extremely sensitive to the uncertainty in subgrid spatial variability, although for storm total accumulation, they are much less sensitive.
引用
收藏
页码:1393 / 1407
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   SAMPLING ERRORS FOR RAIN-GAGE-DERIVED MEAN AREAL DAILY AND MONTHLY RAINFALL [J].
SEED, AW ;
AUSTIN, GL .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 1990, 118 (1-4) :163-173
[42]   Real-time estimation of rainfall fields using radar rainfall and rain gage data [J].
Seo, DJ .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 1998, 208 (1-2) :37-52
[43]  
SINGH VP, 1986, WATER RESOUR BULL, V22, P275
[44]   An intercomparison study of NEXRAD precipitation estimates [J].
Smith, JA ;
Seo, DJ ;
Baeck, ML ;
Hudlow, MD .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1996, 32 (07) :2035-2045
[45]  
SMITH JA, 1991, J APPL METEOROL, V30, P397, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(1991)030<0397:EOTMFB>2.0.CO
[46]  
2
[47]   Catastrophic rainfall from an upslope thunderstorm in the central Appalachians: The Rapidan storm of June 27, 1995 [J].
Smith, JA ;
Baeck, ML ;
Steiner, M .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1996, 32 (10) :3099-3113
[48]   An evaluation of NEXRAD precipitation estimates in complex terrain [J].
Young, CB ;
Nelson, BR ;
Bradley, AA ;
Smith, JA ;
Peters-Lidard, CD ;
Kruger, A ;
Baeck, ML .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1999, 104 (D16) :19691-19703
[49]  
Young CB, 2000, J HYDROMETEOROL, V1, P241, DOI 10.1175/1525-7541(2000)001<0241:ENMPEF>2.0.CO
[50]  
2