Long-Term Outcomes After Catheter Ablation of Cavo-Tricuspid Isthmus Dependent Atrial Flutter A Meta-Analysis

被引:205
作者
Perez, Francisco J. [1 ]
Schubert, Christine M. [2 ]
Parvez, Babar [1 ]
Pathak, Vishesh [1 ]
Ellenbogen, Kenneth A. [1 ]
Wood, Mark A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Med Ctr, Div Cardiol, Richmond, VA 23298 USA
[2] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Biostat, Richmond, VA 23298 USA
关键词
atrial flutter; atrial fibrillation; catheter ablation; meta-analysis; INFERIOR VENA-CAVA; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; PREDICTING BIDIRECTIONAL BLOCK; VOLTAGE-GUIDED ABLATION; CLOSED COOLED-TIP; RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION; CAVOTRICUSPID ISTHMUS; FOLLOW-UP; CONDUCTION BLOCK; IRRIGATED-TIP;
D O I
10.1161/CIRCEP.109.871665
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background-Despite the success of catheter ablation of cavotricuspid isthmus-dependent atrial flutter (AFL), important postablation outcomes are ill-defined. The purpose of our study was to analyze long-term outcomes after catheter ablation of cavotricuspid isthmus-dependent AFL. Methods and Results-A meta-analysis was performed of articles reporting clinical outcomes after catheter ablation of AFL published between January 1988 and July 2008. The analysis included 158 studies comprising 10 719 patients (79% men, 59.8 +/- 0.5 years old, 46% left atrial enlargement, 46% heart disease, 42% with history of atrial fibrillation, 14.3 +/- 0.4 months of follow-up). The overall acute success rate adjusted for reporting bias was 91.1% (95% CI, 89.5 to 92.4), 92.7% (95% CI, 90.0 to 94.8) for 8- to 10-mm tip/or irrigated radiofrequency catheters, and 87.9% (95% CI, 84.2 to 90.9) for 4- to 6-mm tip catheters (P>0.05). Atrial flutter recurrence rates were significantly reduced by use of 8- to 10-mm tip or irrigated radiofrequency catheters (6.7% versus 13.8%, P<0.05) and by use of bidirectional cavotricuspid isthmus block as a procedural end point (9.3% versus 23.6%, P<0.05). The AFL recurrence rate did not increase over time. The overall occurrence rate of atrial fibrillation after AFL ablation was 33.6% (95% CI, 29.7 to 37.3) but was 52.7% (95% CI, 47.8 to 57.6) in patients with a history of atrial fibrillation before ablation and 23.1% (95% CI, 17.5 to 29.9) in those without atrial fibrillation before ablation (P<0.05). The incidence of atrial fibrillation increased over time in both groups; however, 5 years after ablation, the incidence of atrial fibrillation was similar in those with and without atrial fibrillation before ablation. The acute complication rate was 2.6% (95% CI, 2 to 3). The mortality rate during follow-up was 3.3% (95% CI, 2.4 to 4.5). Antiarrhythmic drug use after ablation was 31.6% (95% CI, 25.6 to 37.8). The long-term use of coumadin was 65.9%, (95% CI, 43.8 to 82.8). Quality of life data were very limited. Conclusions-AFL ablation is safe and effective. Ablation technology and procedural end points have greater influences on AFL recurrences than on acute ablation success rates. Atrial fibrillation is common after AFL ablation. Almost one third of patients take antiarrhythmic drugs after AFL ablation. Atrial fibrillation before AFL ablation may indicate a more advanced state of electric disease. (Circ Arrhythmia Electrophysiol. 2009;2:393-401.)
引用
收藏
页码:393 / U135
页数:32
相关论文
共 167 条
[1]  
ABRAMS KR, 2000, METHODS METAANALYSIS
[2]   Correlation between electrogram morphology and standard criteria to validate bidirectional cavotricuspid block in common atrial flutter ablation [J].
Andronache, M ;
de Chillou, C ;
Miljoen, H ;
Magnin-Poull, I ;
Messier, M ;
Dotto, P ;
Beurrier, D ;
Doan, T ;
Houriez, P ;
Bineau-Jorisse, A ;
Thiel, B ;
Brembilla-Perrot, B ;
Massing, JL ;
Sadoul, N ;
Aliot, E .
EUROPACE, 2003, 5 (04) :335-341
[3]   Atrial fibrillation after radiofrequency ablation of atrial flutter:: preventive effect of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor blockers, and diuretics [J].
Anné, W ;
Willems, R ;
Van der Merwe, N ;
Van de Werf, F ;
Ector, H ;
Heidbüchel, H .
HEART, 2004, 90 (09) :1025-1030
[4]   Radiofrequency catheter ablation of common atrial flutter - Significance of palpitations and quality-of-life evaluation in patients with proven isthmus block [J].
Anselme, F ;
Saoudi, N ;
Poty, H ;
Douillet, R ;
Cribier, A .
CIRCULATION, 1999, 99 (04) :534-540
[5]   Transcristal conduction during isthmus ablation of typical atrial flutter:: Influence on success criteria [J].
Anselme, F ;
Savouré, A ;
Ouali, S ;
Cribier, A ;
Saoudi, N .
JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2004, 15 (02) :184-189
[6]   Prospective randomized comparison of cooled radiofrequency versus standard radiofrequency energy for ablation of typical atrial flutter [J].
Atiga, WL ;
Worley, SJ ;
Hummel, J ;
Berger, RD ;
Gohn, DC ;
Mandalakas, NJ ;
Kalbfleisch, S ;
Halperin, H ;
Donahue, K ;
Tomaselli, G ;
Calkins, H ;
Daoud, E .
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2002, 25 (08) :1172-1178
[7]   Occurrence of atrial fibrillation after flutter ablation: The significance of intra-atrial conduction and atrial vulnerability [J].
Baszko, A ;
Simon, RDB ;
Rinaldi, A ;
Gill, JS .
JOURNAL OF ELECTROCARDIOLOGY, 2003, 36 (03) :219-225
[8]   Assessment of the maximum voltage-guided technique for cavotricuspid isthmus ablation during ongoing atrial flutter [J].
Bauernfeind, T. ;
Kardos, A. ;
Foldesi, C. ;
Mihalcz, A. ;
Abraham, P. ;
Szili-Torok, T. .
JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2007, 19 (03) :195-199
[9]   Long term follow up of radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial flutter:: clinical course and predictors of atrial fibrillation occurrence [J].
Bertaglia, E ;
Zoppo, F ;
Bonso, A ;
Proclemer, A ;
Verlato, R ;
Corò, L ;
Mantovan, R ;
D'Este, D ;
Zerbo, F ;
Pascotto, P .
HEART, 2004, 90 (01) :59-63
[10]  
Bielik H, 2005, Z KARDIOL, V94, P564, DOI 10.1007/s00392-005-0263-9