How technology shapes assessment design: Findings from a study of university teachers

被引:56
作者
Bennett, Sue [1 ]
Dawson, Phillip [2 ]
Bearman, Margaret [3 ]
Molloy, Elizabeth [4 ]
Boud, David [5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wollongong, Educ, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
[2] Deakin Univ, Ctr Res Assessment & Digital Learning CRADLE, Geelong, Vic, Australia
[3] Monash Univ, Hlth Profess Educ & Educ Res HealthPEER, Clayton, Vic, Australia
[4] Monash Univ, Hlth Profess Educ & Educ Res HealthPEER Unit, Fac Med Nursing & Hlth Sci, Clayton, Vic, Australia
[5] Deakin Univ, Ctr Res Assessment & Digital Learning, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[6] Middlesex Univ, Inst Work Based Learning, London, England
[7] Univ Technol Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
HIGHER-EDUCATION; FEEDBACK; ENHANCE; IMPACT; TOOL;
D O I
10.1111/bjet.12439
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
A wide range of technologies has been developed to enhance assessment, but adoption has been inconsistent. This is despite assessment being critical to student learning and certification. To understand why this is the case and how it can be addressed, we need to explore the perspectives of academics responsible for designing and implementing technology-supported assessment strategies. This paper reports on the experience of designing technology-supported assessment based on interviews with 33 Australian university teachers. The findings reveal the desire to achieve greater efficiencies and to be contemporary and innovative as key drivers of technology adoption for assessment. Participants sought to shape student behaviors through their designs and made adaptations in response to positive feedback and undesirable outcomes. Many designs required modification because of a lack of appropriate support, leading to compromise and, in some cases, abandonment. These findings highlight the challenges to effective technology-supported assessment design and demonstrate the difficulties university teachers face when attempting to negotiate mixed messages within institutions and the demands of design work. We use these findings to suggest opportunities to improve support by offering pedagogical guidance and technical help at critical stages of the design process and encouraging an iterative approach to design.
引用
收藏
页码:672 / 682
页数:11
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], EMERGING APPROACHES
[2]  
Atkinson D, 2013, AUSTRALAS J EDUC TEC, V29, P651
[3]   An evaluation of the use of Turnitin for electronic submission and marking and as a formative feedback tool from an educator's perspective [J].
Buckley, Emily ;
Cowap, Lisa .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 44 (04) :562-570
[4]   Trust, distrust and their impact on assessment reform [J].
Carless, David .
ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2009, 34 (01) :79-89
[5]  
Daly C., 2010, ASSESS EVAL HIGH EDU, V35
[6]   Assessment Might Dictate the Curriculum, but What Dictates Assessment? [J].
Dawson, Phillip ;
Bearman, Margaret ;
Boud, David J. ;
Hall, Matt ;
Molloy, Elizabeth K. ;
Bennett, Sue ;
Joughin, Gordon .
TEACHING & LEARNING INQUIRY-THE ISSOTL JOURNAL, 2013, 1 (01) :107-111
[7]   Incorporating technologies into a flexible teaching space [J].
Joy, Mike ;
Foss, Jonathan ;
King, Emma ;
Sinclair, Jane ;
Sitthiworachart, Jirarat ;
Davis, Rachel .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 45 (02) :272-284
[8]   Why university lecturers enhance their teaching through the use of technology: a systematic review [J].
Jump, Lynne .
LEARNING MEDIA AND TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 36 (01) :55-68
[9]   Missing: evidence of a scholarly approach to teaching and learning with technology in higher education [J].
Kirkwood, Adrian ;
Price, Linda .
TEACHING IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2013, 18 (03) :327-337
[10]  
Kulkarni C., 2013, ACM T COMPUT-HUM INT, V20, P6