Complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy: Results from a single tertiary referral center

被引:93
作者
Barthet, M [1 ]
Lesavre, N
Desjeux, A
Gasmi, M
Berthezene, P
Berdah, S
Viviand, X
Grimaud, JC
机构
[1] Hop Nord Marseille, Dept Gastroenterol, F-13915 Marseille 20, France
[2] Equipe Mixte Inserm EMI, Marseille, France
[3] Hop Nord Marseille, Dept Surg, Marseille, France
关键词
D O I
10.1055/s-2002-35834
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Study Aims: Complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) have been assessed in recent multicenter studies. The aim of this series was to report and identify risk factors for complications of ES at a single tertiary referral center. Patients and Methods: Between 1996 and 2000,1159 consecutive endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographies (ERCP) procedures were performed and their related complications were assessed. A total of 658 patients (57 %) underwent ES. All the clinical, radiological and biological data were carefully recorded within the 30 days following the procedure. Multivariate analysis was performed using a stepwise logistic model. Results: The morbidity rate for ES was 7.7 %, being moderate to severe in 5 %. Morbidity included acute pancreatitis (3.5 %), perforations (1.8 %), sepsis (1.2 %) and bleeding (1.2 %). The 30-day mortality was 0.9%. In the 1159 ERCP procedures, 231 patients underwent precut papillotomy (20 %) followed by sphincterotomy in 174 cases. Using logistic regression analysis, the risk factors for ES were precut papillotomy (relative risk, RR 2.76), confidence interval, (CI 1.39-5.49) and the presence of sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (RR, 7.72, Cl 3.2-18.4). Conclusions: In this single-center series, we found a complication rate of ES in about 7 %, comparable to that in multicenter series. Precut papillotomy and sphincter of Oddi dysfunction were the main independent risk factors for ES.
引用
收藏
页码:991 / 997
页数:7
相关论文
共 35 条
[11]   NEEDLE KNIFE PAPILLOTOMY - HOW SAFE AND HOW EFFECTIVE [J].
DOWSETT, JF ;
POLYDOROU, AA ;
VAIRA, D ;
DANNA, LM ;
ASHRAF, M ;
CROKER, J ;
SALMON, PR ;
RUSSELL, RCG ;
HATFIELD, ARW .
GUT, 1990, 31 (08) :905-908
[12]   A PROSPECTIVE ASSESSMENT OF RESULTS FOR NEEDLE-KNIFE PAPILLOTOMY AND STANDARD ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY [J].
FOUTCH, PG .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1995, 41 (01) :25-32
[13]   Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy [J].
Freeman, ML ;
Nelson, DB ;
Sherman, S ;
Haber, GB ;
Herman, ME ;
Dorsher, PJ ;
Moore, JP ;
Fennerty, MB ;
Ryan, ME ;
Shaw, MJ ;
Lande, JD ;
Pheley, AM .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 335 (13) :909-918
[14]   Complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy [J].
Freeman, ML .
ENDOSCOPY, 1998, 30 (09) :A216-A220
[15]   Needle knife papillotomy in a university referral practice - Safety and efficacy of a modified technique [J].
Gholson, CF ;
Favrot, D .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1996, 23 (03) :177-180
[16]   Meta-analysis of antibiotic prophylaxis in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) [J].
Harris, A ;
Chan, ACH ;
Torres-Viera, C ;
Hammett, R ;
Carr-Locke, D .
ENDOSCOPY, 1999, 31 (09) :718-724
[17]  
HASTIER C, 2001, GASTROENTEROL CLIN B, V25
[18]   PRECUT PAPILLOTOMY VIA FINE-NEEDLE KNIFE PAPILLOTOME - A SAFE AND EFFECTIVE TECHNIQUE [J].
HUIBREGTSE, K ;
KATON, RM ;
TYTGAT, GNJ .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1986, 32 (06) :403-405
[19]   Needle-knife sphincterotomy in a tertiary referral center: Efficacy and complications [J].
Kasmin, FE ;
Cohen, D ;
Batra, S ;
Cohen, SA ;
Siegel, JH .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1996, 44 (01) :48-53
[20]   ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY OF AMPULLA OF VATER [J].
KAWAI, K ;
AKASAKA, Y ;
MURAKAMI, K ;
TADA, M ;
KOHLI, Y ;
NAKAJIMA, M .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1974, 20 (04) :148-151