Three-dimensional fracture visualisation of multidetector CT of the skull base in trauma patients: comparison of three reconstruction algorithms

被引:38
作者
Ringl, Helmut [1 ]
Schernthaner, Ruediger [1 ]
Philipp, Marcel O. [1 ]
Metz-Schimmerl, Sylvia [1 ]
Czerny, Christian [1 ]
Weber, Michael [1 ]
Gaebler, Christian [2 ]
Steiner-Ringl, Andrea [1 ]
Peloschek, Philipp [1 ]
Herold, Christian J. [1 ]
Schima, Wolfgang [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Radiol, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
[2] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Trauma Surg, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
关键词
Computed tomography; Trauma; Fracture; Skull base; 3D reconstruction; Maximum intensity projection (MIP); RENAL-ARTERY STENOSIS; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; SURFACE; RADIOLOGY; BONE;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-009-1435-1
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
100231 [临床病理学]; 100902 [航空航天医学];
摘要
The purpose of this study was to retrospectively assess the detection rate of skull-base fractures for three different three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction methods of cranial CT examinations in trauma patients. A total of 130 cranial CT examinations of patients with previous head trauma were subjected to 3D reconstruction of the skull base, using solid (SVR) and transparent (TVR) volume-rendering technique and maximum intensity projection (MIP). Three radiologists independently evaluated all reconstructions as well as standard high-resolution multiplanar reformations (HR-MPRs). Mean fracture detection rates for all readers reading rotating reconstructions were 39, 36, 61 and 64% for SVR, TVR, MIP and HR-MPR respectively. Although not significantly different from HR-MPR with respect to sensitivity (P=0.9), MIP visualised 18% of fractures that were not reported in HR-MPR. Because of the relatively low detection rate using HR-MPRs alone, we recommend reading MIP reconstructions in addition to the obligatory HR-MPRs to improve fracture detection.
引用
收藏
页码:2416 / 2424
页数:9
相关论文
共 26 条
[21]
Skull base trauma: Diagnosis and management [J].
Samii, M ;
Tatagiba, M .
NEUROLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2002, 24 (02) :147-156
[22]
Skull base: pseudolesion or true lesion? [J].
Schmalfuss, Ilona M. ;
Camp, Morgan .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2008, 18 (06) :1232-1243
[23]
Radiologic assessment of maxillofacial, mandibular, and skull base trauma [J].
Schuknecht, B ;
Graetz, K .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2005, 15 (03) :560-568
[24]
Minor head injury: Guidelines for the use of CT - A multicenter validation study [J].
Smits, Marion ;
Dippel, Diederik W. J. ;
de Haan, Gijs G. ;
Dekker, Helena M. ;
Vos, Pieter E. ;
Kool, Digna R. ;
Nederkoorn, Paul J. ;
Hofman, Paul A. M. ;
Twijnstra, Albert ;
Tanghe, Herve L. J. ;
Hunink, M. G. Myriam .
RADIOLOGY, 2007, 245 (03) :831-838
[25]
Xu Y M, 1999, Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue, V8, P153
[26]
HIGH-SPATIAL-FREQUENCY (BONE) ALGORITHM IMPROVES QUALITY OF STANDARD CT OF THE THORAX [J].
ZWIREWICH, CV ;
TERRIFF, B ;
MULLER, NL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1989, 153 (06) :1169-1173