A comparative ZOO-FISH analysis in bats elucidates the phylogenetic relationships between Megachiroptera and five microchiropteran families

被引:66
作者
Volleth, M
Heller, KG
Pfeiffer, RA
Hameister, H
机构
[1] Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Inst Zool, D-8520 Erlangen, Germany
[2] Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Inst Humangenet, D-8520 Erlangen, Germany
[3] Univ Ulm, Abt Humangenet, Ulm, Germany
关键词
Chiroptera; chromosome painting; cytotaxonomy; fluorescence in-situ hybridization; phylogenetic relationship;
D O I
10.1023/A:1020992330679
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Fluorescence in-situ hybridization with human whole chromosome painting probes (WCPs) was applied to compare the karyotypes of members of five bat families. Twenty-five evolutionarily conserved units (ECUs) were identified by ZOO-FISH analysis. In 10 of these 25 ECUs, thorough GTG-band comparison revealed an identical banding pattern in all families studied. Differences in the remaining ECUs were used as characters to judge the phylogenetic relationships within Chiroptera. Close relationships were found between Rhinolophidae and Hipposideridae. Also closely related are the representatives of the yangochiropteran families Phyllostomidae (genus studied: Glossophaga, Volleth et al. 1999), Molossidae and Vespertilionidae. All microchiropteran species studied here share four common features not found in the megachiropteran species Eonycteris spelaea. Two of these are considered as derived characters with a high probability of parallel evolution. On the other hand, Eonycteris shares one common, probably derived feature with the rhinolophoid families Rhinolophidae and Hipposideridae and an additional one only with Hipposideridae. At the moment, the relationships between Yangochiroptera, Rhinolophoidea and Megachiroptera must be left in an unsolved trichotomy. Comparison of neighboring segment combinations found in Chiroptera with those found in other mammalian taxa revealed six synapomorphic features for Chiroptera. Therefore, for karyological reasons, monophyly of Chiroptera is strongly supported.
引用
收藏
页码:477 / 497
页数:21
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], BAT RES NEWS
[2]  
Baker R.J., 1988, P31
[3]   EVOLUTIONARY RELATIONSHIP OF THE BRACHYPHYLLINAE TO THE GLOSSOPHAGINE GENERA GLOSSOPHAGA AND MONOPHYLLUS [J].
BAKER, RJ ;
BASS, RA .
JOURNAL OF MAMMALOGY, 1979, 60 (02) :364-372
[4]   PHYLOGENETIC-RELATIONSHIPS AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE HIGHER CATEGORIES OF THE NEW WORLD BAT FAMILY PHYLLOSTOMIDAE [J].
BAKER, RJ ;
HOOD, CS ;
HONEYCUTT, RL .
SYSTEMATIC ZOOLOGY, 1989, 38 (03) :228-238
[5]   BANDED KARYOTYPES OF 11 SPECIES OF AMERICAN BATS (GENUS-MYOTIS) [J].
BICKHAM, JW .
CYTOLOGIA, 1979, 44 (04) :789-797
[6]   Homologies between human and dolphin chromosomes detected by heterologous chromosome painting [J].
Bielec, PE ;
Gallagher, DS ;
Womack, JE ;
Busbee, DL .
CYTOGENETICS AND CELL GENETICS, 1998, 81 (01) :18-25
[7]   Genomic homology of the domestic ferret with cats and humans [J].
Cavagna, P ;
Menotti, A ;
Stanyon, R .
MAMMALIAN GENOME, 2000, 11 (10) :866-870
[8]   Emerging patterns of comparative genome organization in some mammalian species as revealed by Zoo-FISH [J].
Chowdhary, BP ;
Raudsepp, T ;
Frönicke, L ;
Scherthan, H .
GENOME RESEARCH, 1998, 8 (06) :577-589
[9]   ZOO-FISH analysis in insectivores: "Evolution extols the virtue of the status quo" [J].
Dixkens, C ;
Klett, C ;
Bruch, J ;
Kollak, A ;
Serov, OL ;
Zhdanova, N ;
Vogel, W ;
Hameister, H .
CYTOGENETICS AND CELL GENETICS, 1998, 80 (1-4) :61-67
[10]  
Ellerman, 1966, CHECKLIST PALAEARCTI, P810