Protection of the environment from ionising radiation in a regulatory context (protect): proposed numerical benchmark values

被引:114
作者
Andersson, Pal [1 ]
Garnier-Laplace, Jacqueline [2 ]
Beresford, Nicholas A. [3 ]
Copplestone, David [4 ]
Howard, Brenda J. [3 ]
Howe, Paul [5 ]
Oughton, Deborah [6 ]
Whitehouse, Paul [7 ]
机构
[1] Swedish Radiat Safety Author, S-17116 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] CEN Cadarache, DEI SECRE, Inst Radioprotect & Surete Nucl, F-13115 St Paul Les Durance, France
[3] Lancaster Environm Ctr, Ctr Ecol & Hydrol, Lancaster LA1 4AP, England
[4] Environm Agcy, Warrington WA4 1HG, Cheshire, England
[5] Abbots Ripton, Monks Wood, Ctr Ecol & Hydrol, Huntingdon PE28 2LS, Cambs, England
[6] Norwegian Univ Life Sci, Dept Plant & Environm Sci, N-1432 As, Norway
[7] Environm Agcy, W Area Off, Wallingford OX10 8BD, Oxon, England
关键词
Screening values; Predicted no-effect dose rate; Species sensitivity distribution; Ecological risk assessment; Radiation protection; Ionising radiation; EXTERNAL GAMMA-IRRADIATION; EXPOSURE; GROWTH; DERIVATION; FREDERICA; EMBRYOS; ISSUES; FISH;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvrad.2009.05.010
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Criteria are needed to be able to judge the level of risk associated with dose rates estimated for non-human biota. In this paper, European guidance on the derivation of predicted no-effect chemical concentrations has been applied to appropriate radiation sensitivity data. A species sensitivity distribution fitted to the data for all species resulted in a generic predicted no-effect dose rate of 10 mu Gy h(-1). Currently, data are inadequate to derive screening values for separate organism groups. A second, higher, benchmark could aid in decision making by putting results into context on the scale of no effect to a risk of 'serious' effect. The need for, meaning and use of such a value needs to be debated by the wider community. This paper explores potential approaches of deriving scientific input to this debate. The concepts proposed in this paper are broadly consistent with the framework for human protection. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1100 / 1108
页数:9
相关论文
共 62 条
[11]  
BERESFORD NA, 2009, RADIOPROTECTION, V44, P623
[12]   An international comparison of models and approaches for the estimation of the radiological exposure of non-human biota [J].
Beresford, Nicholas A. ;
Balonov, Mikhail ;
Beaugelin-Seiller, Karine ;
Brown, Justin ;
Copplestone, David ;
Hingston, Joanne L. ;
Horyna, Jan ;
Hosseini, Ali ;
Howard, Brenda J. ;
Kamboj, Sunita ;
Nedveckaite, Tatjana ;
Olyslaegers, Geert ;
Sazykina, Tatiana ;
Batlle, Jordi Vives i ;
Yankovich, Tamara L. ;
Yu, Charley .
APPLIED RADIATION AND ISOTOPES, 2008, 66 (11) :1745-1749
[13]  
BONHAM K, 1972, T AM FISH SOC, V101, P428, DOI 10.1577/1548-8659(1972)101<428:SRAROG>2.0.CO
[14]  
2
[15]   The ERICA Tool [J].
Brown, J. E. ;
Alfonso, B. ;
Avila, R. ;
Beresford, N. A. ;
Copplestone, D. ;
Proehl, G. ;
Ulanovsky, A. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY, 2008, 99 (09) :1371-1383
[16]   Radiation doses to aquatic organisms from natural radionuclides [J].
Brown, JE ;
Jones, SR ;
Saxén, R ;
Thorring, H ;
Batlle, JVI .
JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION, 2004, 24 (4A) :A63-A77
[17]   Issues around radiological protection of the environment and its integration with protection of humans: promoting debate on the way forward [J].
Brownless, G. P. .
JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION, 2007, 27 (04) :391-404
[18]  
*CCME, 1995, EPC98E CCME
[19]   The development and purpose of the FREDERICA radiation effects database [J].
Copplestone, D. ;
Hingston, J. ;
Real, A. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY, 2008, 99 (09) :1456-1463
[20]  
COPPLESTONE D, 2001, R D PUBLICATION, V128, P222