Sexual signaling and speciation, a microevolutionary perspective

被引:30
作者
Boake, CRB [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tennessee, Dept Ecol & Evolut Biol, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
acoustic signals; behavioral isolation; communication; Drosophila; pheromones; sexual selection; speciation; visual signals;
D O I
10.1023/A:1021224207727
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Despite the growing evidence that sexual selection can drive speciation, the evolution of sexual signals in natural populations is far from being well-understood. Sexual signals evolve in response to a variety of factors. Some of the most important selective factors are conspecifics, transmission efficiency in a particular environment, detection by predators, and phylogenetic constraints. These factors have been addressed quite successfully in studies of single types of signals in both vertebrates and invertebrates. However, it is less clear how multimodal signals evolve because the factors listed above will act on every component of the signaling system, and the relative weights of each type of signal must be taken into account. Species of Drosophila are excellent for such analyses because they are amenable to both phenotypic experimentation and genetic manipulation. This paper presents an approach that involves two analyses: studies of which signals are sexually selected within a species, and parallel studies of the signals that are involved in behavioral isolation between closely related species. If the same signal characteristics are involved in both processes, they would provide support for the hypothesis that sexual selection can drive speciation. This approach is illustrated with studies of Hawaiian Drosophila and a review of signals that could be sexually selected in Drosophila melanogaster.
引用
收藏
页码:205 / 214
页数:10
相关论文
共 83 条
[11]   Is sexual selection and species recognition a continuum? Mating behavior of the stalk-eyed fly Drosophila heteroneura [J].
Boake, CRB ;
DeAngelis, MP ;
Andreadis, DK .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1997, 94 (23) :12442-12445
[12]  
Boake CRB, 2000, BIOSCIENCE, V50, P501, DOI 10.1641/0006-3568(2000)050[0501:FAMBAS]2.0.CO
[13]  
2
[14]  
Bradbury Jack W., 1998, pi
[15]   A molecular phylogeny for the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup and the problem of polymorphism data [J].
Caccone, A ;
Moriyama, EN ;
Gleason, JM ;
Nigro, L ;
Powell, JR .
MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 1996, 13 (09) :1224-1232
[16]   Sexual isolation of genetically differentiated sympatric populations of Drosophila melanogaster in Brazzaville, Congo:: the first step towards speciation? [J].
Capy, P ;
Veuille, M ;
Paillette, M ;
Jallon, JM ;
Vouidibio, J ;
David, JR .
HEREDITY, 2000, 84 (04) :468-475
[17]   CHROMOSOMAL SUBSTITUTION ANALYSIS OF RECEPTIVITY AND SEXUAL ISOLATION IN DROSOPHILA-MELANOGASTER FEMALES [J].
CARRACEDO, MC ;
PINEIRO, R ;
CASARES, P .
HEREDITY, 1995, 75 :541-546
[18]  
CARSON HL, 1989, EVOLUTION, V43, P190, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1989.tb04217.x
[19]   EVOLUTION OF DROSOPHILA ON THE NEWER HAWAIIAN VOLCANOS [J].
CARSON, HL .
HEREDITY, 1982, 48 (FEB) :3-&
[20]   PHEROMONES, MATE RECOGNITION AND COURTSHIP STIMULATION IN THE DROSOPHILA-MELANOGASTER SPECIES SUBGROUP [J].
COBB, M ;
JALLON, JM .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1990, 39 :1058-1067