The influence of environmental spatial structure on the life-history traits and diversity of species in a metacommunity

被引:22
作者
Buechi, Lucie [1 ]
Christin, Pascal-Antoine [1 ]
Hirzel, Alexandre H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lausanne, Dept Ecol & Evolut, Biophore Bldg, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
关键词
Spatial autocorrelation; Community ecology; Biodiversity; Species traits; Trade-off; Fragmentation; COMPETITIVE COEXISTENCE; DISPERSAL STRATEGIES; COMMUNITY COMPOSITION; LANDSCAPE GEOMETRY; RECONCILING NICHE; TRADE-OFFS; DISTURBANCE; METAPOPULATION; BIODIVERSITY; NEUTRALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.08.005
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Several models have been proposed to understand how so many species can coexist in ecosystems. Despite evidence showing that natural habitats are often patchy and fragmented, these models rarely take into account environmental spatial structure. In this study we investigated the influence of spatial structure in habitat and disturbance regime upon species' traits and species' coexistence in a metacommunity. We used a population-based model to simulate competing species in spatially explicit landscapes. The species traits we focused on were dispersal ability, competitiveness, reproductive investment and survival rate. Communities were characterized by their species richness and by the four life-history traits averaged over all the surviving species. Our results show that spatial structure and disturbance have a strong influence on the equilibrium life-history traits within a metacommunity. In the absence of disturbance, spatially structured landscapes favour species investing more in reproduction, but less in dispersal and survival. However, this influence is strongly dependent on the disturbance rate, pointing to an important interaction between spatial structure and disturbance. This interaction also plays a role in species coexistence. While spatial structure tends to reduce diversity in the absence of disturbance, the tendency is reversed when disturbance occurs. In conclusion, the spatial structure of communities is an important determinant of their diversity and characteristic traits. These traits are likely to influence important ecological properties such as resistance to invasion or response to climate change, which in turn will determine the fate of ecosystems facing the current global ecological crisis. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2857 / 2864
页数:8
相关论文
共 71 条
[41]   SPATIOTEMPORAL DISPERSAL STRATEGIES AND ANNUAL PLANT-SPECIES COEXISTENCE IN A STRUCTURED LANDSCAPE [J].
LAVOREL, S ;
ONEILL, RV ;
GARDNER, RH .
OIKOS, 1994, 71 (01) :75-88
[42]   Predicting changes in community composition and ecosystem functioning from plant traits: revisiting the Holy Grail [J].
Lavorel, S ;
Garnier, E .
FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY, 2002, 16 (05) :545-556
[43]   SPATIAL AUTOCORRELATION - TROUBLE OR NEW PARADIGM [J].
LEGENDRE, P .
ECOLOGY, 1993, 74 (06) :1659-1673
[44]   The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology [J].
Leibold, MA ;
Holyoak, M ;
Mouquet, N ;
Amarasekare, P ;
Chase, JM ;
Hoopes, MF ;
Holt, RD ;
Shurin, JB ;
Law, R ;
Tilman, D ;
Loreau, M ;
Gonzalez, A .
ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2004, 7 (07) :601-613
[45]   DISPERSAL STRATEGIES IN PATCHY ENVIRONMENTS [J].
LEVIN, SA ;
COHEN, D ;
HASTINGS, A .
THEORETICAL POPULATION BIOLOGY, 1984, 26 (02) :165-191
[46]   THE PROBLEM OF PATTERN AND SCALE IN ECOLOGY [J].
LEVIN, SA .
ECOLOGY, 1992, 73 (06) :1943-1967
[47]  
Mackey RL, 2001, ECOLOGY, V82, P3479, DOI 10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[3479:TDDRII]2.0.CO
[48]  
2
[49]  
Maynard Smith J., 1982, pi