Optimum autonomous stand-alone photovoltaic system design on the basis of energy pay-back analysis

被引:52
作者
Kaldellis, J. K. [1 ]
Zafirakis, D. [1 ]
Kondili, E. [2 ]
机构
[1] TEI Piraeus, Lab Soft Energy Applicat & Environm Protect, Athens 12201, Greece
[2] TEI Piraeus, Mech Eng Dept, Optimisat Prod Syst Lab, Athens 12201, Greece
关键词
LCA; Embodied energy; Remote consumer; Battery storage; Island regions; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; ELECTRIFICATION; TECHNOLOGIES; BATTERIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2009.05.003
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Stand-alone photovoltaic (PV) systems comprise one of the most promising electrification solutions for covering the demand of remote consumers. However, such systems are strongly questioned due to extreme life-cycle (LC) energy requirements. For similar installations to be considered as environmentally sustainable, their LC energy content must be compensated by the respective useful energy production, i.e. their energy pay-back period (EPBP) should be found less than their service period. In this context, an optimum sizing methodology is currently developed, based on the criterion of minimum embodied energy. Various energy autonomous stand-alone PV-lead-acid battery systems are examined and two different cases are investigated; a high solar potential area and a medium solar potential area. By considering that the PV-battery (PV-Bat) system's useful energy production is equal to the remote consumer's electricity consumption, optimum cadmium telluride (CdTe) based systems yield the minimum EPBP (15 years). If achieving to exploit the net PV energy production however, the EPBP is found less than 20 years for all PV types. Finally, the most interesting finding concerns the fact that in all cases examined the contribution of the battery component exceeds 27% of the system LC energy requirements, reflecting the difference between grid-connected and stand-alone configurations. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1187 / 1198
页数:12
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
ABOUHUSSEIN MS, 1984, SOLAR WIND TECHNOLOG, V1, P207
[2]   The future role of photovoltaics: A learning curve versus portfolio perspective [J].
Albrecht, Johan .
ENERGY POLICY, 2007, 35 (04) :2296-2304
[3]   Energy viability of photovoltaic systems [J].
Alsema, EA ;
Nieuwlaar, E .
ENERGY POLICY, 2000, 28 (14) :999-1010
[4]   Evaluation of technical improvements of photovoltaic systems through life cycle assessment methodology [J].
Battisti, R ;
Corrado, A .
ENERGY, 2005, 30 (07) :952-967
[5]   Future development of the electricity systems with distributed generation [J].
Bayod-Rujula, Angel A. .
ENERGY, 2009, 34 (03) :377-383
[6]  
BERNALAGUSTIN JL, RENEWABLE S IN PRESS
[7]  
Chaurey A., 1992, Renewable Energy, V2, P227, DOI 10.1016/0960-1481(92)90036-3
[8]   A battery ageing model used in stand alone PV systems [J].
Cherif, A ;
Jraidi, M ;
Dhouib, A .
JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES, 2002, 112 (01) :49-53
[9]   Comparison of small inverters for grid-independent photovoltaic systems [J].
Durisch, W ;
Leutenegger, S ;
Tille, D .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 1998, 15 (1-4) :585-589
[10]  
*EL STOR ASS, 2003, TECHN APPL TECHN COM