Optimum autonomous stand-alone photovoltaic system design on the basis of energy pay-back analysis

被引:52
作者
Kaldellis, J. K. [1 ]
Zafirakis, D. [1 ]
Kondili, E. [2 ]
机构
[1] TEI Piraeus, Lab Soft Energy Applicat & Environm Protect, Athens 12201, Greece
[2] TEI Piraeus, Mech Eng Dept, Optimisat Prod Syst Lab, Athens 12201, Greece
关键词
LCA; Embodied energy; Remote consumer; Battery storage; Island regions; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; ELECTRIFICATION; TECHNOLOGIES; BATTERIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2009.05.003
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Stand-alone photovoltaic (PV) systems comprise one of the most promising electrification solutions for covering the demand of remote consumers. However, such systems are strongly questioned due to extreme life-cycle (LC) energy requirements. For similar installations to be considered as environmentally sustainable, their LC energy content must be compensated by the respective useful energy production, i.e. their energy pay-back period (EPBP) should be found less than their service period. In this context, an optimum sizing methodology is currently developed, based on the criterion of minimum embodied energy. Various energy autonomous stand-alone PV-lead-acid battery systems are examined and two different cases are investigated; a high solar potential area and a medium solar potential area. By considering that the PV-battery (PV-Bat) system's useful energy production is equal to the remote consumer's electricity consumption, optimum cadmium telluride (CdTe) based systems yield the minimum EPBP (15 years). If achieving to exploit the net PV energy production however, the EPBP is found less than 20 years for all PV types. Finally, the most interesting finding concerns the fact that in all cases examined the contribution of the battery component exceeds 27% of the system LC energy requirements, reflecting the difference between grid-connected and stand-alone configurations. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1187 / 1198
页数:12
相关论文
共 45 条
[11]  
*EUR COMM EUR, 2007, MEAS PROGR MOR SUST
[12]  
European Commission, 1997, OFFICIAL J EUROPEAN
[13]   Photovoltaics energy payback times, greenhouse gas emissions and external costs: 2004 - early 2005 status [J].
Fthenakis, V ;
Alsema, E .
PROGRESS IN PHOTOVOLTAICS, 2006, 14 (03) :275-280
[14]  
Global Network on Energy for Sustainable Development, 2004, EN ACC THEM RES SYNT
[15]   PV solar electricity industry: Market growth and perspective [J].
Hoffmann, Wmfried .
SOLAR ENERGY MATERIALS AND SOLAR CELLS, 2006, 90 (18-19) :3285-3311
[16]   Operation conditions of batteries in PV applications [J].
Jossen, A ;
Garche, J ;
Sauer, DU .
SOLAR ENERGY, 2004, 76 (06) :759-769
[17]   Techno-economic comparison of energy storage systems for island autonomous electrical networks [J].
Kaldellis, J. K. ;
Zafirakis, D. ;
Kavadias, K. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2009, 13 (02) :378-392
[18]   Comparing wind and photovoltaic stand-alone power systems used for the electrification of remote consumers [J].
Kaldellis, J. K. ;
Kavadias, K. A. ;
Koronakis, P. S. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2007, 11 (01) :57-77
[19]  
Kaldellis J.K., 2000, P RENEWABLES ENERGY, P1966
[20]   Optimum technoeconomic energy autonomous photovoltaic solution for remote consumers throughout Greece [J].
Kaldellis, JK .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2004, 45 (17) :2745-2760