Non-conscious forms of system justification: Implicit and behavioral preferences for higher status groups

被引:243
作者
Jost, JT [1 ]
Pelham, BW
Carvallo, MR
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Grad Sch Business, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] SUNY Buffalo, Dept Psychol, Buffalo, NY 14260 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00505-X
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
According to system justification theory, people internalize and perpetuate systemic forms of inequality, even though it sometimes means harboring preferences for members of higher status outgroups. In Study 1, students from a high status (but not a low status) university exhibited significant ingroup favoritism on the IAT, an automatic evaluative measure. Furthermore, for students at the high status university, implicit ingroup bias was positively correlated with implicit self-esteem. For students at the low status university, implicit acceptance of consensual stereotypes concerning academic and extracurricular characteristics was associated with implicit outgroup favoritism. In Study 2, Latinos and Asian Americans exhibited significant outgroup favoritism on an unobtrusive behavioral measure by choosing White interaction partners over members of their own groups. In Study 3, parents named newborn children disproportionately after their fathers (compared with their mothers) and published birth announcements for boys slightly more often than for girls. Thus, we observed evidence of system justification on implicit or unobtrusive measures in three different socially disadvantaged groups. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:586 / 602
页数:17
相关论文
共 95 条
[11]   IN-GROUP BIAS IN THE MINIMAL INTERGROUP SITUATION - COGNITIVE-MOTIVATIONAL ANALYSIS [J].
BREWER, MB .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1979, 86 (02) :307-324
[12]  
Byrne D., 1971, ATTRACTION PARADIGM
[13]  
Campbell D.T., 1965, NEBRASKA S MOTIVATIO, P283
[14]  
Carragee KM, 1993, WESTERM J COMMUN, V57, P330, DOI DOI 10.1080/10570319309374457
[15]  
Clark K.B., 1947, READINGS SOCIAL PSYC, P169, DOI DOI 10.2307/2966491
[16]   DO PARENTS DISCRIMINATE AGAINST THEIR HEAVYWEIGHT DAUGHTERS [J].
CRANDALL, CS .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 1995, 21 (07) :724-735
[17]   SOCIAL STIGMA AND SELF-ESTEEM - THE SELF-PROTECTIVE PROPERTIES OF STIGMA [J].
CROCKER, J ;
MAJOR, B .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1989, 96 (04) :608-630
[18]   RECENT UNOBTRUSIVE STUDIES OF BLACK AND WHITE DISCRIMINATION AND PREJUDICE - A LITERATURE-REVIEW [J].
CROSBY, F ;
BROMLEY, S ;
SAXE, L .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1980, 87 (03) :546-563
[19]   Automatic preference for white Americans: Eliminating the familiarity explanation [J].
Dasgupta, N ;
McGhee, DE ;
Greenwald, AG ;
Banaji, MR .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 36 (03) :316-328
[20]  
DEUTSCH MORTON, 1955, JOUR ABNORMAL AND SOCIAL PSYCHOL, V51-31, P629, DOI 10.1037/h0046408