Use of a static adjustable ankle-foot orthosis following tibial nerve block to reduce plantar-flexion contracture in an individual with brain injury

被引:12
作者
Blanton, S
Grissom, SP
Riolo, L
机构
[1] Emory Ctr Rehabil Med, EXCITE Natl Clin Trial, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[2] Virginia Mason Med Ctr Phys Med & Rehabil, Seattle, WA USA
[3] Univ Oklahoma, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Rehabil Sci, Oklahoma City, OK USA
[4] Univ Oklahoma, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Geriatr Med, Oklahoma City, OK USA
来源
PHYSICAL THERAPY | 2002年 / 82卷 / 11期
关键词
ankle joint; brain injury; contracture; range of motion; static adjustable orthosis;
D O I
10.1093/ptj/82.11.1087
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Purpose. Ankle plantar-flexion contractures are a common complication of brain injuries and can lead to secondary limitations in mobility. Case Description. The patient was a 44-year-old woman with left hemiplegia following a right frontal arteriovenous malformation resection. She had a left ankle plantar-flexion contracture of -31 degrees from neutral. After a tibial nerve. block, an adjustable ankle-foot orthosis was applied 23 hours a day for 27 days. Adjustments of the orthosis were made as the contracture was reduced. The patient received physical therapy during the 27-day period for functional mobility activities and stretching the plantar flexors outside of the orthosis. Outcomes. The patient's dorsiflexion passive range of motion increased from -31 degrees to +10 degrees. Discussion. The application of an adjustable ankle-foot orthosis following a tibial nerve block, as an addition to a physical therapy regimen of stretching and mobility training, may reduce plantar-flexion contractures in patients with brain injury. [Blanton S, Grissom SP, Riolo L. Use of a static adjustable ankle-foot orthosis following tibial nerve block to reduce plantar-flexion contracture in an individual with brain injury.
引用
收藏
页码:1087 / 1097
页数:11
相关论文
共 66 条
[41]  
Lehmkuhl LD, 1990, J HEAD TRAUMA REHAB, V5, P23, DOI DOI 10.1097/00001199-199012000-00005
[42]   LOW-LOAD PROLONGED STRETCH VS HIGH-LOAD BRIEF STRETCH IN TREATING KNEE CONTRACTURES [J].
LIGHT, KE ;
NUZIK, S ;
PERSONIUS, W ;
BARSTROM, A .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1984, 64 (03) :330-333
[43]  
LUNDYEKMAN L, 1998, NEUROSCIENCE FUNDAME, P177
[44]   LOW-LOAD, PROLONGED STRETCH IN TREATMENT OF ELBOW FLEXION CONTRACTURES SECONDARY TO HEAD TRAUMA - A CASE-REPORT [J].
MACKAYLYONS, M .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1989, 69 (04) :292-296
[45]  
MADDING S W, 1987, Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy, V8, P409
[46]  
MAYER NH, 1999, REHABILITATION ADULT, P503
[47]   THE USE OF SPLINTS IN THE TREATMENT OF JOINT STIFFNESS - BIOLOGIC RATIONALE AND AN ALGORITHM FOR MAKING CLINICAL DECISIONS [J].
MCCLURE, PW ;
BLACKBURN, LG ;
DUSOLD, C .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1994, 74 (12) :1101-1107
[48]  
Moore S, 1993, Aust J Physiother, V39, P271, DOI 10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60487-6
[49]  
MORITZ U, 1973, SCAND J REHABIL MED, V5, P160
[50]  
Moseley A, 1993, Aust J Physiother, V39, P259, DOI 10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60486-4